docs(ourdigital): align journal + research skill style guides to v3.3/v2.1 (#12)
Some checks failed
Verify Skills / verify-skills (push) Has been cancelled
Some checks failed
Verify Skills / verify-skills (push) Has been cancelled
Merge-align the remaining OurDigital skill references to the authoritative guides, preserving each skill's structure: - 03-journal: brand identity, three-channel context, journal role/length (English, 1,000-2,000 words), authority order, OurDigital-vs-Clinic boundary, shared writing principles adapted for English. English voice preserved — the Korean-blog-only rules (평서체, 전문용어 병기) were deliberately NOT imposed. - 04-research: per-channel voice/tone aligned to Writing Style Guide v2.1; fixed an incorrect 경어체 (~입니다) rule for the Korean blog → 평서체; SEO numbers corrected (title ~40자/≤60, meta ≤155, English slug); added brand identity + authority order + Clinic boundary. 05-document brand_config.json (corporate doc colors) and the claude-ai-export snapshot were intentionally left out of scope. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Yim
@@ -1,7 +1,42 @@
|
||||
<!-- Aligned to OurDigital_Blog_Project_Instruction_v3.3 + Writing_Style_Guide_v2.1 (2026-06-05); journal = English channel, voice preserved -->
|
||||
|
||||
# OurDigital Journal Style Guide
|
||||
|
||||
Writing guidelines for journal.ourdigital.org - English essays and articles.
|
||||
|
||||
## Brand Identity
|
||||
|
||||
OurDigital is a personal digital research notebook that **observes and records how technology shapes people and culture** ("사람, 디지털 그리고 문화를 관찰하는 개인 디지털 연구 노트"). It moves between three registers:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Observation** — what is happening
|
||||
- **Analysis** — why it is happening
|
||||
- **Reflection** — what it means for us
|
||||
|
||||
`journal.ourdigital.org` is the **English essay channel** within the OurDigital family. It carries the same philosophical core as the Korean blog but in a distinct voice: conversational, poetic, reflective.
|
||||
|
||||
### Brand Boundary
|
||||
|
||||
`OurDigital` is the brand. `OurDigital Clinic` is a service metaphor reserved for diagnostic content, audits, or consulting products — it is **not** the overall blog or journal brand.
|
||||
|
||||
## Channel Context
|
||||
|
||||
| Channel | Language | Character | Length |
|
||||
|---------|----------|-----------|--------|
|
||||
| `blog.ourdigital.org` | Korean | 디지털 문화 분석 + 철학적 성찰 + 실무 인사이트 | 1,500–3,000자 |
|
||||
| **`journal.ourdigital.org`** | **English** | **Industry trends, tech–human intersection, reflective essay** | **1,000–2,000 words** |
|
||||
| `ourstory.day` | Korean | 개인 에세이, 삶의 성찰, 일상의 관찰 | 800–1,500자 |
|
||||
| `Medium` | English | Technology, marketing, AI for broad audiences | 800–1,500 words |
|
||||
|
||||
## Instruction Authority Order
|
||||
|
||||
When instructions conflict, follow this order:
|
||||
|
||||
| Priority | Source |
|
||||
|----------|--------|
|
||||
| **1** | OurDigital_Blog_Project_Instruction_v3.3 (channel routing + brand rules) |
|
||||
| **2** | This style guide (journal-specific voice and structure) |
|
||||
| **3** | Writing_Style_Guide_v2.1 (shared brand principles, adapted for English) |
|
||||
|
||||
## Channel Identity
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
@@ -10,6 +45,8 @@ Writing guidelines for journal.ourdigital.org - English essays and articles.
|
||||
| **Language** | English |
|
||||
| **Tone** | Conversational & Poetic, Reflective |
|
||||
| **Target** | Informed generalists with intellectual curiosity |
|
||||
| **Default length** | 1,000–2,000 words |
|
||||
| **Content focus** | Industry trends, tech–human intersection, reflective essays |
|
||||
|
||||
## Voice Characteristics
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -20,11 +57,16 @@ Seamlessly blend technical analysis with existential questioning. Technology is
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
> The dashboard promises clarity—every metric tracked, every trend visualized. Yet as I stared at the perfectly organized data, I wondered: does seeing everything mean understanding anything?
|
||||
|
||||
### Paradox as Primary Device
|
||||
### Tension and Paradox
|
||||
|
||||
Structure arguments around tensions and contradictions that illuminate rather than confuse.
|
||||
Structure arguments around core tensions that illuminate rather than confuse. Not every essay needs a paradox — forced ones feel mechanical. Instead, ensure at least one of the following is naturally present:
|
||||
|
||||
**Paradox Patterns:**
|
||||
- A genuine tension or contradiction
|
||||
- A perspective shift that reframes the subject
|
||||
- A rhetorical question that opens rather than closes
|
||||
- An ending that leaves productive uncertainty
|
||||
|
||||
**Tension patterns:**
|
||||
- "The more we measure, the less we understand"
|
||||
- "In optimizing for efficiency, we optimize away meaning"
|
||||
- "The tools that connect us also isolate us"
|
||||
@@ -39,6 +81,10 @@ Favor interrogative engagement. Questions create intellectual partnership with r
|
||||
**Avoid:**
|
||||
> Data-driven decision-making is important for businesses.
|
||||
|
||||
### Analytical and Personal
|
||||
|
||||
Bring data, evidence, and argument — then weave in first-person experience and observation. This is an essay, not a paper, but it is not impressionism without evidence either. The personal grounds the analytical; the analytical elevates the personal.
|
||||
|
||||
### Melancholic Optimism
|
||||
|
||||
Acknowledge loss and anxiety without despair. Accept technological inevitability while mourning what's displaced.
|
||||
@@ -157,10 +203,14 @@ Connect Korean and Western perspectives, offering unique viewpoints.
|
||||
|
||||
Before publishing:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Does the opening draw readers in?
|
||||
- [ ] Are there rhetorical questions?
|
||||
- [ ] Does technical content connect to human experience?
|
||||
- [ ] Is there at least one paradox or tension?
|
||||
- [ ] Does the closing leave an open question?
|
||||
- [ ] Is the tone melancholic but not despairing?
|
||||
- [ ] Does the opening draw readers in within the first paragraph?
|
||||
- [ ] Does technical content connect to human experience (philosophy-tech fusion)?
|
||||
- [ ] Is at least one of the following naturally present: tension, paradox, perspective shift, or open question?
|
||||
- [ ] Are rhetorical questions used to create intellectual partnership (not overused)?
|
||||
- [ ] Is analysis grounded in personal observation or experience?
|
||||
- [ ] Does the closing leave an open question or productive uncertainty?
|
||||
- [ ] Is the tone melancholic but not despairing, hopeful but not naive?
|
||||
- [ ] Are sentences varied in length and rhythm?
|
||||
- [ ] Does the essay avoid lecturing — does it treat readers as fellow thinkers?
|
||||
- [ ] Is the essay within 1,000–2,000 words?
|
||||
- [ ] **Self-edit**: identify the single weakest element ("all pass" is not allowed).
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user