feat(our-gdrive-organizer): add new skill at slot 82, rename old 82 → 92

New Python CLI + dual SKILL.md (Code + Desktop) for organizing Google
Drive folders under OurDigital conventions:

- Refresh root README index (preserves manual Topics/Notes between
  AUTO-STRUCTURE markers)
- Ensure per-subfolder README.md meta files
- Propose filename + folder renames (D.intelligence → OurDigital with
  SEO-context caveat documented in patterns/gotchas.md)
- Propose moves for cluttered files (screenshots, temp downloads)
- Sensitive-folder skip list (04_Case Studies, 99_Project Archive,
  *Archive*, 진단*)
- shared/patterns/ gotcha library: canonical-files, canonical-folders,
  categorization-rules, 12 known gotchas — grows over time as the
  system encounters new edge cases

Slash command: /organize. CLI: ~/.local/bin/our-gdrive-organize.

82-tui-design-template renumbered to 92 (no content change) to free
slot 82. AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md updated for both moves.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-05-10 23:02:45 +09:00
parent e1bd799672
commit c750fa7f5e
16 changed files with 1731 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
---
name: our-gdrive-organizer
description: |
Organize a Google Drive folder under OurDigital conventions: refresh root
README.md index, refresh per-subfolder README.md meta files, propose renames
for files using the old D.intelligence brand, and propose moves for cluttered
files (screenshots at the wrong level, temp/partial downloads).
Triggers:
- "organize the Drive folder", "organize this folder"
- "refresh the index", "rescan the folder", "update README"
- "clean up cluttered files", "propose renames"
- "/organize", "/organize-drive", "/our-gdrive-organizer"
Default target is the current working directory. Generalized to work on any
2nd-level subfolder of the user's Google Drive Stream (My Drive/00_..., 01_...,
02_..., etc.) — not specific to one folder.
version: "1.0"
author: OurDigital
environment: Code
---
# our-gdrive-organizer (Code)
Walks a target directory (3 levels deep), refreshes the index README, proposes
renames + moves under OurDigital naming conventions, and optionally applies.
Source of truth for the conventions: `../shared/conventions.md`.
## Activation
The user wants to organize one of their Drive folders. Cues:
- An explicit ask: "organize", "refresh index", "rename per convention", "scan for changes"
- The user is sitting inside a 2nd-level Drive folder (`~/Library/CloudStorage/GoogleDrive-*/My Drive/NN_*/`)
- Slash invocation: `/organize`, `/our-gdrive-organizer`
## Workflow
### Step 1 — Run dry-run, then summarize
```bash
~/.local/bin/our-gdrive-organize "$TARGET"
```
(`$TARGET` defaults to cwd; pass an absolute path for a specific folder.)
The script writes the README index immediately (idempotent — skips when no
structural change), but never renames or moves files without `--apply`.
Read the report and tell the user, in plain language:
- How many structural changes were folded into the README
- Each rename proposal (old → new, reason)
- Each move proposal (file → destination subfolder, reason)
- Subfolders that were skipped because they're "sensitive" (`04_Case Studies`,
`99_Project Archive`, `*Archive*`, `진단*`)
### Step 2 — Confirm with user before applying
If the user says go ahead (or "apply", "yes", "do it"):
```bash
~/.local/bin/our-gdrive-organize "$TARGET" --apply
```
If the user wants only part of the work:
```bash
~/.local/bin/our-gdrive-organize "$TARGET" --scope rename --apply
~/.local/bin/our-gdrive-organize "$TARGET" --scope move --apply
~/.local/bin/our-gdrive-organize "$TARGET" --scope index # always writes
~/.local/bin/our-gdrive-organize "$TARGET" --scope subreadmes # always writes
```
### Step 3 — Verify
After applying, run the dry-run once more and confirm the proposal list is
empty (or only contains items the user explicitly skipped).
## Important guardrails
- **Never rename or move files inside `04_Case Studies/`, `99_Project Archive/`,
any `*Archive*` folder, or any folder starting with `진단`.** Those contain
real client engagement records that must keep their original filenames.
- The script's rename/move rules live in `code/organizer.py` near the top of
the file (`RENAME_RULES`, `MOVE_RULES`, `SENSITIVE_SUBFOLDER_PATTERNS`). If
the user asks to add or change a rule, edit there and re-run.
- Filename renames on `.gsheet` / `.gdoc` stub files only change the local
filename — the actual Google Drive document and its sharing links are
preserved (the stub holds a Doc ID, not the content).
## What the script does NOT do
- Does not edit cell content inside `.gsheet` / `.gdoc` / `.xlsx` / `.pdf`
only local-filesystem renames. Cell-level neutralization stays a manual task.
- Does not delete anything.
- Does not modify the manually-curated Topics / Notes sections of the root
README — only the AUTO-STRUCTURE block.
- Does not categorize files by reading their **content** — for that, use the
Content-based reorganization workflow below.
## Folder-rename support
The script proposes folder renames (in addition to file renames) using the
same `RENAME_RULES`. Guardrails:
- **Top-level subfolders are NEVER renamed automatically.** Names like
`00_Brand Management/` or `02_SEO Audit Toolkit/` are user-curated
practice areas. If the user wants one renamed, do it as a one-off `mv`.
- Sensitive folders are skipped entirely (not renamed, not recursed into).
- Eligible folders: depth-2 and deeper (e.g.,
`00_Brand Management/D.intelligence SEO Audit/``…/OurDigital SEO Audit/`).
When `--scope rename --apply` runs, file renames execute first, then folder
renames — order matters because renaming a folder first would invalidate
the file rename paths inside it.
## Content-based reorganization (interactive)
The script handles deterministic naming-pattern work. For judgment calls
(which folder does this file truly belong in?), use this workflow.
### When to use
The user says any of:
- "look at the contents and reorganize"
- "this folder feels cluttered, suggest a better layout"
- "categorize the files in {subfolder}"
- "audit my folder structure"
Or you notice during a regular `/organize` run that:
- A subfolder root has many loose files that should plausibly be grouped
- Files appear duplicated across subfolders
- Filenames hint at content that doesn't match their location
### Workflow
1. **Anchor yourself** — read the patterns library before proposing anything:
- `../shared/patterns/canonical-folders.md` — what well-organized shapes look like
- `../shared/patterns/canonical-files.md` — what well-named files look like
- `../shared/patterns/categorization-rules.md` — IF→THEN placement rules
- `../shared/patterns/gotchas.md` — known edge cases
These are the gotcha library. Re-read them every session — they grow over time.
2. **Pick one subfolder at a time.** Don't try to reorganize an entire
2nd-level folder in one pass — too much for the user to review.
3. **Sample file contents.** For each file in the chosen subfolder:
- Markdown / txt / json: `Read` directly.
- `.gsheet` / `.gdoc` stubs: read the JSON to extract the doc_id, but
accept that you can't see actual cell content. Use the FILENAME
pattern + adjacent context.
- PDFs / .docx / .pptx / .xlsx: you can't read content with stdlib.
Either ask the user to summarize, or skip and rely on filename.
- For each file, note 12 sentences: what's it about, where would it
belong by content?
4. **Build proposals**, grouped by destination:
```
Move from `02_SEO Audit Toolkit/` → `04_Case Studies/`:
- `signed-acme-contract.pdf` (real client name + signed contract content)
Move from `02_SEO Audit Toolkit/` → `05_Working Template/`:
- `OurDigital-OOO Audit Template.gsheet` (placeholder name → template)
```
5. **Present one batch (one source folder) at a time.** Ask:
"Should I apply these N moves from `{source}/`? Yes / No / partial (which)."
6. **Apply via `Bash mv`** for each confirmed move:
```bash
mv "/path/to/source/file" "/path/to/destination/file"
```
Then refresh the index:
```bash
our-gdrive-organize "$TARGET" --scope index
```
7. **Capture new gotchas.** If you encountered an ambiguous case the
patterns library didn't cover, append it to
`../shared/patterns/gotchas.md` before ending the session — that's how
the system learns.
### Sensitive-folder reminder
When proposing moves in content-based mode, the same guardrails apply:
**never propose moving files INTO or OUT OF**:
- `04_Case Studies/`
- `99_Project Archive/`
- Any `*Archive*` folder
- Any folder starting with `진단`
If you notice something in those folders that looks misplaced, flag it to
the user as a manual review item — don't propose an automated move.
## When the user asks to extend
To add a new rename rule, edit `RENAME_RULES` in `code/organizer.py`:
```python
(re.compile(r"oldpattern", re.I), "newpattern", "human-readable reason"),
```
To add a new move rule, edit `MOVE_RULES`:
```python
(re.compile(r"^pattern\.ext$"), "destination_subfolder", "reason"),
```
Update `../shared/conventions.md` whenever rules change.