refactor(skills): Restructure skills to dual-platform architecture
Major refactoring of ourdigital-custom-skills with new numbering system: ## Structure Changes - Each skill now has code/ (Claude Code) and desktop/ (Claude Desktop) versions - New progressive numbering: 01-09 General, 10-19 SEO, 20-29 GTM, 30-39 OurDigital, 40-49 Jamie ## Skill Reorganization - 01-notion-organizer (from 02) - 10-18: SEO tools split into focused skills (technical, on-page, local, schema, vitals, gsc, gateway) - 20-21: GTM audit and manager - 30-32: OurDigital designer, research, presentation - 40-41: Jamie brand editor and audit ## New Files - .claude/commands/: Slash command definitions for all skills - CLAUDE.md: Updated with new skill structure documentation - REFACTORING_PLAN.md: Migration documentation - COMPATIBILITY_REPORT.md, SKILLS_COMPARISON.md: Analysis docs ## Removed - Old skill directories (02-05, 10-14, 20-21 old numbering) - Consolidated into new structure with _archive/ for reference 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
60
.claude/commands/jamie-audit.md
Normal file
60
.claude/commands/jamie-audit.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
|
||||
# Jamie Brand Audit
|
||||
|
||||
Jamie Clinic content **review and evaluation** tool.
|
||||
|
||||
## Triggers
|
||||
- "review Jamie content", "브랜드 검토", "audit brand compliance"
|
||||
|
||||
## Capabilities (Guidance-based)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Voice & Tone Check** - 격식체 ratio, honorifics
|
||||
2. **Brand Alignment** - Slogan, values, no competitors
|
||||
3. **Regulatory Compliance** - Medical advertising laws
|
||||
4. **Technical Accuracy** - Procedure facts, recovery times
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
### Voice & Tone
|
||||
- [ ] 90% 격식체 ratio maintained
|
||||
- [ ] Correct honorifics (환자분/고객님)
|
||||
- [ ] Jamie personality traits present
|
||||
|
||||
### Brand Alignment
|
||||
- [ ] Slogan consistency
|
||||
- [ ] Core values reflected
|
||||
- [ ] No competitor mentions
|
||||
|
||||
### Regulatory Compliance
|
||||
- [ ] No exaggerated claims
|
||||
- [ ] No guarantee language
|
||||
- [ ] Proper disclosures included
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Accuracy
|
||||
- [ ] Procedure facts correct
|
||||
- [ ] Medical terms accurate
|
||||
- [ ] Recovery times realistic
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Brand Audit Report
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Score: 85/100
|
||||
|
||||
## Issues Found
|
||||
1. Line 23: "최고의" → Remove superlative claim
|
||||
2. Line 45: Missing disclosure for before/after image
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommendations
|
||||
- Adjust tone in paragraph 3
|
||||
- Add required disclaimers
|
||||
|
||||
## Verdict: REVISION REQUIRED
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
1. Receive content for review
|
||||
2. Check against brand guidelines
|
||||
3. Verify regulatory compliance
|
||||
4. Provide structured feedback
|
||||
5. Recommend approval/revision
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user