Add jamie-copy-trimmer (48) and dintel-campaign-designer (78) skills

Import two skills authored in Claude Cowork: jamie-copy-trimmer as a
root-only Jamie skill, and campaign-gate-process as dintel-campaign-designer
with full D.intelligence Agent Corps packaging (code/desktop/shared,
agent-id 78, Draft & Wait autonomy) since it now sits inside the 70-79
block. Bumps the corps roster count to 9 agents + 1 meta-agent across all
sibling skills and registers #78 in the shared USER-GUIDE/README. Also adds
.claude/commands wrappers and ~/.claude/skills symlinks so both are usable.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

custom-skills/48-jamie-copy-trimmer/references/witty_within_limits.md

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+# Making Copy Trendy / Catchy Within 심의 Limits
+
+> Premise: **the ceiling on wit is set by 의료광고 심의.** If the fun relies on exaggeration, superlatives, inducement, or comparison, it is void.
+> Goal: restrained appeal that still catches the eye inside the rules.
+
+## Six techniques that work
+
+### 1. Win with specificity
+Drop abstractions ("아름다움") for a concrete scene or object — the concreteness itself feels fresh.
+- Flat: "자신감을 드립니다" → Sharp: "거울 보는 시간이 즐거워집니다"
+
+### 2. Borrow the customer's words
+Use the exact phrase the target types into a search box or community post as the headline.
+- Ex: "표정 관리, 매번 큰맘 먹지 않아도"
+
+### 3. Unexpected frame (reframe/twist)
+Bend a familiar idea slightly, without creating a misunderstanding.
+- Ex: "주름은 나이가 아니라 표정 습관" (educational reframe)
+
+### 4. Rhythm / parallelism / rhyme
+Make it stick through the pleasure of sound: parallel structure, triads, alliteration.
+- Caution: never sacrifice meaning for rhyme.
+
+### 5. Restrained humor (keep dignity)
+Light but not cheap; never at the cost of the clinic's trust.
+- Safe: situational empathy humor ("월요일 아침 눈꺼풀처럼 무거운")
+- Risky: appearance-shaming, anxiety-baiting, self-deprecation
+
+### 6. Whitespace and brevity
+Don't say everything. Stop at one line and leave the rest to consultation.
+
+## Boundaries — wit that does NOT work
+- Appearance-shaming / anxiety-baiting ("이대로 괜찮으세요?" pressure)
+- Superlatives dressed as humor ("완벽 변신 실화")
+- Inducement-as-fun ("친구 데려오면 개이득") → 심의 / inducement violation
+- Neologism / meme overuse → ages fast and is a top 심의-rejection cause
+- Dignity-damaging or provocative gags
+
+## Wit intensity by channel
+| Channel | Wit allowance | Note |
+|---------|---------------|------|
+| Instagram | High (still 심의) | Focus on the first-line hook |
+| Blog / homepage | Medium | Educational tone first; wit at the subhead level |
+| 카플친 / 알림톡 | Low | Warm, thank-you tone; no heavy gags |
+| In-clinic POP | Medium | One catchy line, understood instantly |
+| Search ad | Low | Clarity and compliance first |
+
+## Self-check questions
+- Does this joke create a misunderstanding (effect / safety)?
+- Is any inducement (economic-benefit emphasis) mixed in?
+- Will it still be fresh in 6 months (not meme-dependent)?
+- Does it read cleanly aloud, with no stumble?