|
|
60734dbde7
|
Recalibrate estimate for SMB acceptability
Real-world feedback: list-rate calc overshot SMB-acceptable levels.
- scaling: driver properties_total -> subbrands_total (chains share templates),
cap x6.5 -> x2.0, applied to On-page only (Technical now fixed site-wide)
- add 'smb' entry tier (lean hours @ 0.55 billing); 3-tier auto-select
(smb/basic/treatment) by portfolio size; per-tier billing; --baseline smb enabled
- docs (findings_to_service.md, SKILL.md) synced to 3-tier model
Effect: SHR 25-property chain 71.5M -> 29.5M; SMB single hotel ~3.0M;
basic/treatment still reproduce real 10.5M/25.0M at 1 property.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
2026-05-28 01:13:38 +09:00 |
|
|
|
5f66f57a8e
|
Rebuild estimate engine to effort-based SOW model
Replace flat per-service ranges with OurDigital's real quoting model
(role_rate × billing_rate 0.70 × standard hours), sourced from the
06_Working Template quotes:
- rate_card.yaml: role rate card, billing/basis/terms, tools, scaling bands
- sow_templates.yaml: basic + treatment task-hour templates
- estimate.py: assemble SOW from findings, scale Technical/On-page hours by
properties_total, 제안가 = 합계 floored to 500k
- build_deck.py: estimate slide shows module 소계 + 제안가 (point)
- findings_to_service.md / SKILL.md / DESIGN.md: synced to new model
Validated: reproduces real Basic ₩10.5M and Treatment ₩25.0M exactly;
SHR (25 properties) scales to ₩71.5M, L'Escape (1) = ₩25.0M.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
2026-05-28 00:51:52 +09:00 |
|
