4.2 KiB
4.2 KiB
name, description
| name | description |
|---|---|
| seo-signal-validation | Validate whether a claimed SERP / Knowledge-Graph movement for a (term, entity) is real, misattributed, an artifact, or unprovable — before reporting impact. Triggers: validate serp signal, is this ranking real, prove SEO impact, SEMrush surge real, signal validation, real impact check, 신호 검증, 순위 변화 진짜, 오가닉 급증 검증, 임팩트 검증. |
SEO Signal Validation
Purpose
Given a (term/intent, entity) pair — and optionally a claim (a third-party
tool's reported movement) or a baseline (a prior state) — return an
evidence-backed verdict on whether SERP and Knowledge-Graph impact is real.
Built because modeled third-party signals (SEMrush/Ahrefs estimated organic
traffic, position snapshots) are easy to over-trust. This skill makes the
measured → live → entity → attribution cascade a single repeatable procedure
ending in a defensible verdict and a client-safe narrative.
When to use (boundary)
This is the conductor, not an instrument. It sequences and synthesizes the three measurement skills — it does not duplicate them.
| Use instead | When |
|---|---|
20-seo-serp-analysis |
You only need SERP composition / features |
21-seo-position-tracking |
You only need rank over time |
28-seo-knowledge-graph |
You only need an entity-presence audit |
| this skill | You must adjudicate whether a claimed movement is real across layers |
Step 0 — Classify entity + pick mode
- Entity ownership (gates which layers exist):
- First-party — a site/property you own or have GSC/GA4 access to (e.g. JHR
sc-domain:josunhotel.com, GA4258308769) → L1 measured available. - Third-party — a competitor brand or a person you do not control → L1 unavailable; lean on L2 + L3 + clearly-tiered estimates; apply the confidence cap (see Verdict). If unclear, ask once.
- First-party — a site/property you own or have GSC/GA4 access to (e.g. JHR
- Mode (thin wrappers over the same cascade):
adjudicate(claim)— a 3rd-party tool reports a move; confirm/refute.prove(baseline)— after our change; before/after from GSC/GA4 history.snapshot()— no claim; "where do we really stand."
The validation loop (cost-ordered cascade, short-circuiting)
Run cheapest-first; stop early when a layer is already decisive.
L1 — Measured (first-party ground truth) → via 21-seo-position-tracking
- GSC
mcp__dda__gsc_fetch_performance: the term at query level (exact) AND site-wide, for recent vs prior windows. Pull clicks / impressions / position / CTR. Day-normalize (compare windows differ in calendar-day count). Note ~43% query-level anonymization — the disclosed subset ≠ the whole. - GA4
mcp__dda__ga4_run_report:Organic Searchsessions monthly trend (dimsyearMonth+sessionDefaultChannelGroup, metricsessions). GA4 includes Naver + all engines — use it to test whether a "surge" exceeds normal month-to-month variance. - Compute deltas with the helper (deterministic, avoids ad-hoc parsing):
save each GSC pull, then run
python3 code/scripts/gsc_signal_delta.py --recent <recent.tsv> --prior <prior.tsv> --recent-days N --prior-days M --claim-term "<term>". It returns day-normalized site totals, top gainers/decliners, and whether the claimed term is among the real movers. - SHORT-CIRCUIT: if the claimed keyword has trivial clicks and a real position nowhere near the claim → ARTIFACT; stop unless the caller wants the full picture.
L2 — Live SERP (3rd-party measured, point-in-time) → via 20-seo-serp-analysis
- Geo-correct Google render via
claude-in-chrome(navigate→read_page): forcegl/hl+ correct geo,pws=0; decline precise-location prompts. Confirm whether the domain actually holds the claimed position; capture the feature landscape (ads, local map-pack, PAA, knowledge panel) that explains why a brand site can't own a head term. - Cheap rank spot-check:
mcp__ourseo__check_serp(keyword, domain). - [KR market] Naver SERP composition:
our research naver serp(blog / cafe / 지식iN / Smart Store / brand zone) — Semrush/Ahrefs don't model Naver.