Files
our-claude-skills/custom-skills/04-ourdigital-research/code/references/research-frameworks.md
Andrew Yim 0bc24d00b9 feat: Add OurDigital custom skills package (10 skills)
Complete implementation of OurDigital skills with dual-platform support
(Claude Desktop + Claude Code) following standardized structure.

Skills created:
- 01-ourdigital-brand-guide: Brand reference & style guidelines
- 02-ourdigital-blog: Korean blog drafts (blog.ourdigital.org)
- 03-ourdigital-journal: English essays (journal.ourdigital.org)
- 04-ourdigital-research: Research prompts & workflows
- 05-ourdigital-document: Notion-to-presentation pipeline
- 06-ourdigital-designer: Visual/image prompt generation
- 07-ourdigital-ad-manager: Ad copywriting & keyword research
- 08-ourdigital-trainer: Training materials & workshop planning
- 09-ourdigital-backoffice: Quotes, proposals, cost analysis
- 10-ourdigital-skill-creator: Meta skill for creating new skills

Features:
- YAML frontmatter with "ourdigital" or "our" prefix triggers
- Standardized directory structure (code/, desktop/, shared/, docs/)
- Shared environment setup (_ourdigital-shared/)
- Comprehensive reference documentation
- Cross-skill integration support

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-31 16:50:17 +07:00

3.5 KiB

Research Frameworks

Framework Selection Guide

Topic Type Framework Best For
Trend analysis STEEP + Timeline Industry shifts, emerging tech
Problem-solution Problem Tree Pain points, how-to guides
Comparison Feature Matrix Tool reviews, option analysis
Strategy SWOT + Action Business recommendations
Technical Layered Deep-Dive Implementation guides

STEEP + Timeline Framework

For analyzing trends and industry changes:

S - Social: User behavior changes, demographics
T - Technological: New tools, platforms, capabilities  
E - Economic: Market conditions, pricing trends
E - Environmental: Sustainability, resource factors
P - Political/Legal: Regulations, compliance

Timeline:
- Past (2-3 years): What changed?
- Present: Current state of play
- Future (1-2 years): Projections

Problem Tree Framework

For diagnostic and solution-oriented research:

ROOT PROBLEM
├── Cause 1
│   ├── Sub-cause 1.1
│   └── Sub-cause 1.2
├── Cause 2
│   └── Sub-cause 2.1
└── Cause 3

SOLUTIONS
├── Solution A → addresses Cause 1
├── Solution B → addresses Cause 2
└── Solution C → addresses Cause 3

Feature Matrix Framework

For comparisons and evaluations:

| Criteria | Option A | Option B | Option C | Weight |
|----------|----------|----------|----------|--------|
| Feature 1 | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | High |
| Feature 2 | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐ | Medium |
| Feature 3 | ⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | Low |
| Price | $$$ | $$ | $ | High |

Weighted Score: Calculate based on importance
Recommendation: Based on user's priority

Layered Deep-Dive Framework

For technical and implementation topics:

Layer 1: Concept (What is it?)
- Definition
- Key components
- How it works (simplified)

Layer 2: Context (Why does it matter?)
- Business value
- Use cases
- When to use vs. alternatives

Layer 3: Implementation (How to do it?)
- Prerequisites
- Step-by-step process
- Code/configuration examples

Layer 4: Optimization (How to do it well?)
- Best practices
- Common pitfalls
- Advanced techniques

Layer 5: Measurement (How to know it works?)
- Success metrics
- Monitoring approach
- Iteration guidance

Research Question Templates

Exploratory Questions

  • "What is the current state of [topic]?"
  • "How has [topic] evolved in the past [timeframe]?"
  • "Who are the key players/stakeholders in [topic]?"

Analytical Questions

  • "What factors drive [outcome] in [context]?"
  • "How does [variable A] affect [variable B]?"
  • "What patterns emerge when comparing [X] and [Y]?"

Evaluative Questions

  • "What are the strengths and limitations of [approach]?"
  • "How effective is [solution] for [problem]?"
  • "What criteria should guide [decision]?"

Practical Questions

  • "How can [audience] implement [solution]?"
  • "What resources are needed for [action]?"
  • "What are the risks and mitigations for [approach]?"

Source Priority

  1. Primary: Official documentation, research papers, authoritative reports
  2. Secondary: Industry publications, expert analysis, case studies
  3. Tertiary: News articles, blog posts, community discussions

Always cross-reference claims across multiple source types.

Data Quality Checklist

  • Source credibility verified
  • Publication date recent (within context)
  • Statistics include sample size/methodology
  • Claims are falsifiable/verifiable
  • Potential biases identified
  • Conflicting viewpoints considered