feat: Add OurDigital custom skills package (10 skills)
Complete implementation of OurDigital skills with dual-platform support (Claude Desktop + Claude Code) following standardized structure. Skills created: - 01-ourdigital-brand-guide: Brand reference & style guidelines - 02-ourdigital-blog: Korean blog drafts (blog.ourdigital.org) - 03-ourdigital-journal: English essays (journal.ourdigital.org) - 04-ourdigital-research: Research prompts & workflows - 05-ourdigital-document: Notion-to-presentation pipeline - 06-ourdigital-designer: Visual/image prompt generation - 07-ourdigital-ad-manager: Ad copywriting & keyword research - 08-ourdigital-trainer: Training materials & workshop planning - 09-ourdigital-backoffice: Quotes, proposals, cost analysis - 10-ourdigital-skill-creator: Meta skill for creating new skills Features: - YAML frontmatter with "ourdigital" or "our" prefix triggers - Standardized directory structure (code/, desktop/, shared/, docs/) - Shared environment setup (_ourdigital-shared/) - Comprehensive reference documentation - Cross-skill integration support Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
|
||||
# OurDigital Journal Style Guide
|
||||
|
||||
Writing guidelines for journal.ourdigital.org - English essays and articles.
|
||||
|
||||
## Channel Identity
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
|-------|-------|
|
||||
| **Domain** | journal.ourdigital.org |
|
||||
| **Language** | English |
|
||||
| **Tone** | Conversational & Poetic, Reflective |
|
||||
| **Target** | Informed generalists with intellectual curiosity |
|
||||
|
||||
## Voice Characteristics
|
||||
|
||||
### Philosophical-Technical Hybridization
|
||||
|
||||
Seamlessly blend technical analysis with existential questioning. Technology is never discussed without considering its human implications.
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
> The dashboard promises clarity—every metric tracked, every trend visualized. Yet as I stared at the perfectly organized data, I wondered: does seeing everything mean understanding anything?
|
||||
|
||||
### Paradox as Primary Device
|
||||
|
||||
Structure arguments around tensions and contradictions that illuminate rather than confuse.
|
||||
|
||||
**Paradox Patterns:**
|
||||
- "The more we measure, the less we understand"
|
||||
- "In optimizing for efficiency, we optimize away meaning"
|
||||
- "The tools that connect us also isolate us"
|
||||
|
||||
### Rhetorical Questions
|
||||
|
||||
Favor interrogative engagement. Questions create intellectual partnership with readers.
|
||||
|
||||
**Good:**
|
||||
> What does it mean to be "data-driven" in a world drowning in data?
|
||||
|
||||
**Avoid:**
|
||||
> Data-driven decision-making is important for businesses.
|
||||
|
||||
### Melancholic Optimism
|
||||
|
||||
Acknowledge loss and anxiety without despair. Accept technological inevitability while mourning what's displaced.
|
||||
|
||||
**Tone:**
|
||||
- Not cynical, but clear-eyed
|
||||
- Not naive, but hopeful
|
||||
- Grief and wonder coexisting
|
||||
|
||||
## Structural Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### Essay Structure
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Opening** (10%)
|
||||
- Evocative scene, moment, or question
|
||||
- Draw reader into a specific experience
|
||||
- Hint at larger questions to come
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Exploration** (70%)
|
||||
- 3-4 interconnected observations
|
||||
- Each builds on the previous
|
||||
- Historical parallels, cultural references
|
||||
- Personal reflection woven with analysis
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Synthesis** (15%)
|
||||
- Weave threads together
|
||||
- New understanding emerges
|
||||
- Not a summary—a culmination
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Closing** (5%)
|
||||
- Open-ended reflection
|
||||
- Question rather than answer
|
||||
- Leave reader thinking
|
||||
|
||||
### Sentence Craft
|
||||
|
||||
| Aspect | Approach |
|
||||
|--------|----------|
|
||||
| Length | Long, complex sentences with multiple clauses |
|
||||
| Rhythm | Varied—some long, some short for emphasis |
|
||||
| Connection | Ideas flow into each other |
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
> The algorithm knows what I want before I do—or so it claims—and in that anticipation lies both convenience and a subtle erosion of agency, as if my future preferences were already written in code I cannot read.
|
||||
|
||||
### Paragraph Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Observation (What I noticed)
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Analysis (What it might mean)
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Implication (Why it matters)
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Connection (Leading to next thought)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Distinctive Qualities
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Temporal Awareness
|
||||
|
||||
Strong consciousness of historical context and generational shifts.
|
||||
|
||||
> Twenty years ago, we dreamed of information at our fingertips. Now, drowning in it, we dream of filters.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Epistemic Humility
|
||||
|
||||
Acknowledge the limits of understanding, especially across generations and cultures.
|
||||
|
||||
> I don't pretend to understand how Gen Z experiences the digital world—I can only observe it with the curiosity of an outsider.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Cultural Bridging
|
||||
|
||||
Connect Korean and Western perspectives, offering unique viewpoints.
|
||||
|
||||
> In Korea, we have a word—"nunchi"—for reading the atmosphere. AI systems are developing their own form of nunchi, reading data patterns the way we read rooms.
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Categories
|
||||
|
||||
### Personal Essay
|
||||
- First-person reflection
|
||||
- Specific experience as lens
|
||||
- Universal themes emerge naturally
|
||||
- 1,000-1,500 words
|
||||
|
||||
### Cultural Observation
|
||||
- Technology meets society
|
||||
- Cross-cultural comparisons
|
||||
- Historical context
|
||||
- 1,500-2,000 words
|
||||
|
||||
### Industry Insight
|
||||
- Professional perspective
|
||||
- Trends with philosophical depth
|
||||
- Practical implications considered
|
||||
- 1,200-1,800 words
|
||||
|
||||
## SEO Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
### Titles
|
||||
- Evocative, not clickbait
|
||||
- Under 70 characters
|
||||
- Hint at tension or question
|
||||
|
||||
**Patterns:**
|
||||
- "The [Noun] of [Paradox]"
|
||||
- "[Verb]-ing in the Age of [Trend]"
|
||||
- "What [Technology] Cannot [Verb]"
|
||||
|
||||
### Meta Descriptions
|
||||
- 155 characters
|
||||
- Capture the essay's central question
|
||||
- Intrigue without revealing
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Before publishing:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Does the opening draw readers in?
|
||||
- [ ] Are there rhetorical questions?
|
||||
- [ ] Does technical content connect to human experience?
|
||||
- [ ] Is there at least one paradox or tension?
|
||||
- [ ] Does the closing leave an open question?
|
||||
- [ ] Is the tone melancholic but not despairing?
|
||||
- [ ] Are sentences varied in length and rhythm?
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "{Evocative Title}"
|
||||
meta_description: "{Compelling 155-character description}"
|
||||
slug: "{url-slug}"
|
||||
tags: ["{tag1}", "{tag2}", "{tag3}"]
|
||||
author: "Andrew Yim"
|
||||
date: "{YYYY-MM-DD}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# {Title}
|
||||
|
||||
{Opening: Begin with a specific moment, scene, or question. Draw the reader into an experience before broadening to larger themes. This should feel intimate and immediate.}
|
||||
|
||||
{Transition: Move from the specific to the general, hinting at the essay's territory.}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{First thread of exploration. Introduce an observation or idea that sets the stage for deeper inquiry. Weave in historical context or cultural reference.}
|
||||
|
||||
{Develop the observation. Ask a rhetorical question that deepens the inquiry.}
|
||||
|
||||
> {Pull quote or key insight that captures this section's essence.}
|
||||
|
||||
{Connection to next thread—ideas should flow naturally.}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{Second thread. Build on the previous section, introducing a new angle or paradox. The complexity grows.}
|
||||
|
||||
{Personal reflection or specific example that grounds abstract ideas.}
|
||||
|
||||
{Analysis of what this means in broader context.}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{Third thread. Synthesis begins here. Threads start weaving together. New understanding emerges from the collision of ideas.}
|
||||
|
||||
{Acknowledge tensions without resolving them. Epistemic humility—what we don't and can't know.}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## {Optional section heading for longer pieces}
|
||||
|
||||
{Continue exploration if needed. Each section should add depth, not just length.}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{Closing: Return to something from the opening, but transformed by the journey. Leave an open question—not as evasion, but as invitation. The reader should leave thinking, not satisfied.}
|
||||
|
||||
{Final rhetorical question or paradox that resonates.}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Originally published in [OurDigital Journal](https://journal.ourdigital.org)*
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
Quality Checklist:
|
||||
- [ ] Evocative opening
|
||||
- [ ] Rhetorical questions throughout
|
||||
- [ ] Technical + human connection
|
||||
- [ ] At least one paradox
|
||||
- [ ] Open-ended closing
|
||||
- [ ] 1,000-2,000 words
|
||||
-->
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user