Add jamie-copy-trimmer (48) and dintel-campaign-designer (78) skills

Import two skills authored in Claude Cowork: jamie-copy-trimmer as a
root-only Jamie skill, and campaign-gate-process as dintel-campaign-designer
with full D.intelligence Agent Corps packaging (code/desktop/shared,
agent-id 78, Draft & Wait autonomy) since it now sits inside the 70-79
block. Bumps the corps roster count to 9 agents + 1 meta-agent across all
sibling skills and registers #78 in the shared USER-GUIDE/README. Also adds
.claude/commands wrappers and ~/.claude/skills symlinks so both are usable.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

.claude/commands/dintel-campaign-designer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+---
+description: D.intelligence campaign/promotion planning as a 3-gate process (cross-brand)
+---
+
+# D.intelligence Campaign Designer
+
+Plans campaigns, promotions, events, and launches as a 3-gate process -- Discovery & Debate → Brief → Plan -- instead of jumping straight to a finished document. Draft & Wait autonomy: each gate stops for explicit approval. Not D.intelligence-exclusive -- works for any brand.
+
+## Triggers
+- "campaign plan", "plan a promotion", "캠페인 설계"
+- 캠페인 기획, 프로모션 기획, 기획안 만들어, 이벤트 기획
+
+## The 3 Gates
+1. **Discovery & Debate** -- agree ONE primary objective; steelman + devil's-advocate debate; pre-mortem; 1-3 reference cases; effects as hypotheses. → `shared/templates/gate1-decision-log.md`
+2. **Brief** -- objective, audience, offer, message, tone, channel; outcome metrics across 4 tiers. → `shared/templates/gate2-campaign-brief.md`
+3. **Plan** -- full plan, handed off to `marketing:campaign-plan` + `doc-generator`; all risk/compliance consolidated in one closing "준비 점검 사항" section. → `shared/templates/gate3-plan-outline.md`
+
+## 4-Tier Outcome Framework
+Awareness/cognitive → Qualitative (name the brand asset) → Relationship/advocacy → Quantitative conversion (label as hypothesis if no baseline)
+
+## Cross-Brand Routing
+| Brand | Copy & tone | Compliance |
+|---|---|---|
+| D.intelligence | dintel-brand-editor (#71) | dintel-brand-guardian (#70) |
+| Jamie | jamie-copy-trimmer (48) | jamie-brand-audit (41) |
+| OurDigital | ourdigital-ad-manager (07) | ourdigital-brand-guide (01) |
+
+## Guardrails
+- Never advance a gate without explicit user approval
+- Never commit pricing/quantitative targets without a baseline -- label as hypothesis
+- Mark gaps `[확인]` instead of inventing facts

.claude/commands/jamie-copy-trimmer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+---
+description: Trims and sharpens Korean plastic-surgery/aesthetic marketing copy against cliché & compliance corpus
+---
+
+# Jamie Copy Trimmer
+
+Trim and sharpen Korean plastic-surgery / aesthetic-medical marketing copy against an industry expression corpus, within 의료광고 심의 limits. Guidance-only skill (no scripts).
+
+## Triggers
+- "카피 다듬어", "카피 트리밍", "네이밍 검토", "슬로건 다듬어"
+- "심의 안전하게", "copy trim", "make it catchier"
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- The corpus is a map for AVOIDING clichés, not a library to copy
+- 의료광고 심의 is a gate, not a score -- one 🔴 risk expression fails the option outright
+- Trim first, dazzle second
+- Don't guess -- mark `[확인]`
+
+## Workflow (5 steps)
+1. **Diagnose** -- tag each phrase 🟢 effective / 🟡 cliché / 🔴 compliance risk / ⚪ flat / 🟦 brand asset
+2. **Trim** -- remove all 🔴, replace 🟡, delete redundancy
+3. **Elevate** -- 2-3 alternatives per element within 심의 limits, matched to channel tone
+4. **Re-score** -- 5-axis rubric (감각/차별성/브랜드적합성/심의 PASS-FAIL/명료성)
+5. **Recursive Improvement** -- propose feeding adopted/rejected expressions back into the corpus
+
+## Output (Korean)
+진단 → 트리밍 → 대안 → 재평가 → 추천안 → 준비 점검 사항 (risks/gaps consolidated at the end)
+
+## References
+- `references/corpus_compliance_risk.md` -- medical-ad risk expressions (most important)
+- `references/corpus_cliche.md`, `corpus_effective.md`, `corpus_examples.md`
+- `references/witty_within_limits.md`, `evaluation_rubric.md`, `recursive_protocol.md`
+
+## Guardrails
+- Compliance judgment here is guidance, not legal advice -- always recommend pre-publication 의료광고 자율심의
+- A specific brand's tone guide (e.g. jamie-brand-audit) overrides this skill's taste defaults

CLAUDE.md

@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ This is a Claude Skills collection repository containing:
 | 45 | jamie-instagram-manager | Instagram account management | "Instagram management", "IG strategy" |
 | 46 | jamie-journal-editor | Journal/blog content for journal.jamie.clinic | "Jamie journal", "제이미 저널", "진료실 이야기" |
 | 47 | jamie-marketing-editor | Multi-channel marketing content & ad copy | "Jamie marketing", "제이미 마케팅", "광고 카피" |
+| 48 | jamie-copy-trimmer | Trim/sharpen Korean aesthetic-medical copy against cliché & compliance corpus | "카피 다듬어", "카피 트리밍", "심의 안전하게", "copy trim" |
 
 ### NotebookLM Tools (50-59)
 
@@ -109,6 +110,7 @@ This is a Claude Skills collection repository containing:
 | 75 | dintel-marketing-mgr | Content pipeline (Magazine D., newsletter, LinkedIn) | Draft & Wait | "콘텐츠 발행", "newsletter" |
 | 76 | dintel-backoffice-mgr | Invoicing, contracts, NDA, HR operations | Draft & Wait | "계약서", "인보이스" |
 | 77 | dintel-account-mgr | Client relationship management & monitoring | Mixed | "client status", "미팅 준비" |
+| 78 | dintel-campaign-designer | Campaign/promotion planning as a 3-gate process (Discovery & Debate → Brief → Plan); cross-brand, not D.intelligence-exclusive | Draft & Wait | "campaign plan", "캠페인 기획", "기획안 만들어" |
 | 79 | dintel-skill-update | Cross-skill consistency management (meta-agent) | Triggered | "skill sync", "스킬 업데이트" |
 
 **Shared infrastructure:** `_dintel-shared/` (Python package + reference docs)
@@ -253,6 +255,7 @@ our-claude-skills/
 │   ├── 45-jamie-instagram-manager/
 │   ├── 46-jamie-journal-editor/
 │   ├── 47-jamie-marketing-editor/
+│   ├── 48-jamie-copy-trimmer/
 │   │
 │   ├── 50-notebooklm-agent/
 │   ├── 51-notebooklm-automation/
@@ -271,6 +274,7 @@ our-claude-skills/
 │   ├── 75-dintel-marketing-mgr/
 │   ├── 76-dintel-backoffice-mgr/
 │   ├── 77-dintel-account-mgr/
+│   ├── 78-dintel-campaign-designer/
 │   ├── 79-dintel-skill-update/
 │   │
 │   ├── 80-claude-settings-optimizer/

custom-skills/48-jamie-copy-trimmer/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+---
+name: jamie-copy-trimmer
+description: >-
+  Trims and sharpens Korean plastic-surgery / aesthetic marketing copy — headlines, body,
+  CTAs, names, slogans. Removes clichés and medical-ad compliance risks, suggests trendy,
+  catchy alternatives within 의료광고 심의 limits, and re-scores them. Use when copy feels
+  awkward or old, or to refine, name, or compliance-check any copy. Triggers: 카피 다듬어,
+  카피 트리밍, 네이밍 검토, 슬로건 다듬어, 심의 안전하게, copy trim, make it catchier, 제이미 카피.
+  For Jamie work, use with jamie-brand-guardian.
+license: Proprietary (OurDigital internal)
+---
+
+# Jamie Copy Trimmer
+
+Trim and sharpen Korean plastic-surgery / aesthetic-medical marketing copy against an industry expression corpus, within medical-advertising limits.
+
+**Working language.** These directives are in English, but the copy you evaluate and produce is Korean — the language of the target market. Write all deliverable copy, alternatives, and the final report in Korean unless the user asks otherwise.
+
+## Core philosophy (internalize this)
+
+1. **The corpus is a map for AVOIDING clichés, not a library to COPY.** Frequently used means probably already stale. Use it to spot what everyone says and go elsewhere. Copying corpus phrases defeats the purpose, which is differentiation.
+2. **The ceiling on wit is set by 의료광고 심의.** Korean plastic-surgery copy is constrained by rules against exaggeration, superlatives, and patient inducement. Raise the appeal, but anything past the compliance line is void. Compliance is a **gate, not a score** — if a single 🔴 risk expression remains, that option fails outright.
+3. **Trim first, dazzle second.** Cutting redundancy, clichés, and risk is the primary job. Add restrained flair into the space you cleared. "Say less, land harder."
+4. **Don't guess — mark [확인].** If procedure facts, target, channel, or brand tone are missing, ask the user or leave a `[확인]` note and move on. Never fill gaps with invention.
+
+## Before you start (inputs)
+
+Ask, or mark `[확인]`, if any of these are missing:
+- **Copy text** and its type (headline / body / CTA / name / slogan)
+- **Channel** (카카오플러스친구 / Instagram / blog / Naver / in-clinic POP / search ad) — tone and 심의 strictness differ by channel
+- **Procedure & target** (standard procedure name, patient concern)
+- **Brand tone** — for a specific brand (e.g., Jamie), that brand's guide (`jamie-brand-guardian`) overrides this skill's taste defaults
+
+## Workflow (5 steps)
+
+### 1) Diagnose — tag the original
+Tag each phrase/expression. When unsure, read the matching corpus file.
+
+| Tag | Meaning | Action |
+|-----|---------|--------|
+| 🟢 effective | Works, resonates | Keep |
+| 🟡 cliché | Industry-stale, tired | Trim / replace (→ `corpus_cliche.md`) |
+| 🔴 compliance risk | Exaggeration, superlative, inducement, comparison | Must remove/replace (→ `corpus_compliance_risk.md`) |
+| ⚪ flat | Not wrong, but no hook | Sharpen (→ `witty_within_limits.md`) |
+| 🟦 brand asset | Brand-owned phrase | Do not misjudge as cliché (e.g., Jamie's "티 안 나게") |
+
+### 2) Trim
+Remove all 🔴, replace 🟡, delete redundancy. Output of this step is a "safe, plain" version.
+
+### 3) Elevate — add appeal within 심의 limits
+Using techniques in `witty_within_limits.md`, give **2–3 alternatives per element**, each with a rationale (why it lands harder), matched to the channel's tone. Consult `corpus_examples.md` for technique coordinates — never copy the examples verbatim.
+
+### 4) Re-score — 5-axis rubric
+Score original vs. improved with `evaluation_rubric.md`. 심의 is a PASS/FAIL gate. In the brand-fit axis, state in one line **which brand attribute / association / asset** the copy strengthens (keeps qualitative judgment concrete rather than vague).
+
+### 5) Recursive Improvement — evolve the corpus
+Per `recursive_protocol.md` (Recursive Improvement Protocol), propose feeding this session's adopted/rejected expressions back into the corpus. Demote once-effective phrases that have become common to the cliché list.
+
+## Output format (produce the report in Korean, using this structure)
+
+```
+## 카피 트리밍 결과 — [대상/채널]
+
+### 1) 진단
+- "원문 문구" → 🔴/🟡/⚪/🟢/🟦  사유
+
+### 2) 트리밍 (담백한 안)
+[군더더기·위험 제거 버전]
+
+### 3) 대안 (심의 한도 내 감각안)
+| 요소 | 원문 | 문제 | 개선안 2~3개 | 근거 |
+
+### 4) 재평가 (5축, 1~5점 · 심의=게이트)
+| 축 | 원문 | 추천안 | 코멘트 |
+| 감각 / 차별성 / 브랜드적합성 / 심의(P·F) / 명료성 |
+→ 강화되는 브랜드 자산: [속성/연상 명시]
+
+### 5) 추천안 + 이유
+
+### 6) 준비 점검 사항
+- [확인] 심의 필요 / 정보 부재 / 사실 검증 필요 항목을 여기 모아 정리
+```
+
+Keep risk items and open questions out of the body; collect them at the end under **준비 점검 사항** (brevity principle).
+
+## Reference files (read as needed)
+
+- `references/corpus_compliance_risk.md` — medical-ad risk expressions + safe replacements (**most important**)
+- `references/corpus_cliche.md` — stale/old expressions to avoid (avoidance coordinates)
+- `references/corpus_effective.md` — working patterns (application coordinates; don't copy verbatim)
+- `references/corpus_examples.md` — analyzed real-world exemplar copy (technique coordinates; no imitation)
+- `references/witty_within_limits.md` — making copy trendy/catchy inside 심의 limits, and the boundaries
+- `references/evaluation_rubric.md` — the 5-axis re-scoring rubric and gate rules
+- `references/recursive_protocol.md` — Recursive Improvement Protocol and corpus tagging schema
+
+## Reminders
+
+- Compliance judgment here is guidance, not legal advice. Always leave a `[확인]` recommending pre-publication 의료광고 자율심의.
+- For a specific brand, that brand's tone guide wins over this skill's defaults.
+- The corpus is a living document — even effective phrases go stale. Refresh it periodically via `recursive_protocol.md`.

custom-skills/48-jamie-copy-trimmer/references/corpus_cliche.md

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+# Cliché / Stale Expressions (🟡) — Avoidance Coordinates
+
+> **This list is for avoiding, not copying.** Frequently used = already tired.
+> If a listed expression shows up in the copy, consider replacing it. The "refresh direction" is a lead for finding an alternative, not a ready-made line.
+
+## A. Beauty/result show-off (stale)
+| Cliché (Korean) | Why it's old | Refresh direction |
+|-----------------|--------------|-------------------|
+| 여신, 인형 같은, 리즈 갱신, 인생 리즈 | Ranks looks, unrealistic, 10-years-ago tone | Replace with a concrete everyday-change scene |
+| 물광, 꿀광, 동안 미모 | Spent beauty buzzwords | Use the customer's concern language, not glow words |
+| 확 달라진, 몰라보게, 환골탈태 | Exaggeration; borders on 심의 risk | Restrain and specify the degree of change |
+
+## B. Self-flattering filler (empty)
+| Cliché | Why it's old | Refresh direction |
+|--------|--------------|-------------------|
+| 특별한 당신을 위한, 당신만의 | Said to everyone = says nothing | Name a truly specific concern/situation |
+| 아름다움을 완성하다, 당신의 아름다움 | Abstract, boilerplate | Make it concrete with verbs/scenes |
+| 프리미엄, 명품, 하이엔드 | Unbacked elevation words | Replace with facts (technique, track record) |
+
+## C. Pressure/urgency (also inducement risk)
+| Cliché | Why it's old | Refresh direction |
+|--------|--------------|-------------------|
+| 지금 바로, 서두르세요, 놓치지 마세요 | Pressure cliché, lowers trust | Informational CTA ("편하게 문의해 주세요") |
+| 마감 임박, 선착순, 단 O명 | Inducement/pressure, 심의 risk | Keep any time-limited notice plain, strip inducement |
+| 후회 없는 선택, 결심만 하세요 | Decision-coercion tone | Leave the decision with the customer |
+
+## D. Region/class clichés
+| Cliché | Why it's old | Refresh direction |
+|--------|--------------|-------------------|
+| 강남 언니, 청담동 스타일, 강남 미인 | Regional cliché, fatigue | Replace region with specific result/experience |
+
+## E. Over-used "safe" words (the irony)
+| Expression | Caution | Refresh direction |
+|------------|---------|-------------------|
+| 자연스러운 / 자연스럽게 | The whole industry overuses it → loses distinctiveness | Keep the concept, vary the expression (scene/metaphor). ※ If a brand owns it as a slogan, treat as 🟦 |
+| 1:1 맞춤, 나만의 디자인 | Now a standard phrase | Make the "what" of the customization concrete |
+
+## F. Form habits (hurt readability)
+- Exclamation spam (!!!), emoji overload, question-mark spam → one breath per sentence, restrained emoji
+- All-caps / all-bold → emphasize in one place only
+
+---
+*Update rule: when you spot a newly-stale expression, add it here per `recursive_protocol.md`, and demote over-common "effective" phrases into this file.*

custom-skills/48-jamie-copy-trimmer/references/corpus_compliance_risk.md

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+# Compliance Risk Dictionary (🔴) + Safe Replacements
+
+> Based on Korean medical law and 의료광고 심의 (medical-ad review) standards. **This is not legal advice** — recommend pre-publication self-regulatory review. If any 🔴 remains, the option FAILS the rubric gate.
+
+## Contents
+1. Absolute / superlative expressions
+2. Effect-guarantee / definitive expressions
+3. Patient-inducement expressions
+4. Comparative / exclusivity expressions
+5. Testimonials / reviews / before-after photos
+6. Neologisms / non-standard procedure names
+7. Missing mandatory disclosures
+8. Safe-replacement technique
+
+---
+
+## 1. Absolute / superlative (prohibited)
+Overstating or misleading beyond objective fact is prohibited.
+- Risk terms: `100%`, `완벽`, `완전`, `전혀`, `모든`, `유일`, `최고`, `국내 1위`, `NO.1`, `확실히`, `반드시`, `무조건` (and English `best`, `only`, `perfect`)
+- Replace with: "대부분의 경우", "개인에 따라 차이가 있습니다", "~를 기대할 수 있습니다"; use numbers only with a cited basis.
+
+## 2. Effect-guarantee / definitive (prohibited / caution)
+- Risk terms: `부작용 없는`, `안전한` (as an absolute), `반영구`, `평생`, `재발 없음`, `100% 자연스러움`, `반드시 예뻐지는`
+- Replace with: "부작용은 극히 드뭅니다", "오래 유지되는 편입니다", "자연스러운 결과를 기대할 수 있습니다" + **attach a side-effect disclosure**.
+
+## 3. Patient inducement (Medical Act Art. 27(3) risk)
+Offering economic benefit to induce/solicit patients carries strong illegality risk.
+- Risk terms: `무료`, `공짜`, `1+1`, `이벤트가`, `할인 이벤트`, `선착순 할인`, `○○원` (price front-loaded as a lure), `후기 작성 시 할인/적립/사은품`, `친구 소개하면`
+- Replace with: quote price only as "상담 시 안내"; keep any discount **decoupled** from reviews/referrals as a plain time-limited notice; request reviews only voluntarily with no compensation.
+- Note: even phrasing like "얼마일까" has been flagged as inducement.
+
+## 4. Comparative / exclusivity (prohibited)
+- Risk terms: `타 병원보다`, `다른 곳과 다르게` (disparaging tone), `국내 유일`, `업계 최초` (unverified), any direct/indirect disparagement of competitors
+- Replace with: "저희만의 방법으로"; state own strengths factually (uniqueness instead of comparison).
+
+## 5. Testimonials / reviews / before-after photos (review-subject, caution)
+- Risk: using patient reviews or before/after photos in ads; implying effect via testimonial
+- Handle: advertising use is subject to 심의; before/after must meet rules (same conditions, no misleading) → `[확인]` for review.
+
+## 6. Neologisms / non-standard procedure names (caution)
+Neologisms and gimmicky phrasing are a top cause of 심의 rejection.
+- Risk: unverified proprietary procedure names, trendy slang, jargon
+- Replace with: standard procedure names first; pair a brand procedure name with its standard name.
+
+## 7. Missing mandatory disclosures (formal requirement)
+- Required: **advertiser (clinic name)**, **side-effect / caution disclosure**, and on large online platforms the **review-approval number and validity period**
+- Missing these risks unreviewed-ad / labeling violations → confirm with a checklist.
+
+## 8. Safe-replacement technique
+- Absolute → qualified ("대부분", "개인차")
+- Guarantee → expectation ("기대할 수 있습니다")
+- Inducement → information ("상담 시 안내")
+- Comparison → uniqueness ("저희만의")
+- Always pair with a side-effect disclosure and the advertiser name.
+
+---
+*Sources: 대한의사협회 의료광고 심의기준; 의료광고 심의 금지 문구 안내; 강남언니 광고 가이드; related legal columns. Confirm the latest standard with the self-regulatory body.*

custom-skills/48-jamie-copy-trimmer/references/corpus_effective.md

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+# Effective Patterns (🟢) — Application Coordinates
+
+> **These are patterns, not finished lines.** Adapt the structure to the situation; pasting an example verbatim quickly turns it into a cliché.
+
+## 1. Customer's own words (mirror the concern)
+Naming the concern in the words a customer actually uses beats abstract praise.
+- Pattern: [specific moment] + [discomfort]
+- Ex: "웃을 때 잡히는 이마 주름", "눈뜨는 게 무거운 아침", "화장이 자꾸 접히는 눈가"
+- Why: people who recognize themselves stop and read.
+
+## 2. Scene & verb driven (restrain adjectives)
+A scene or verb that reveals the result beats an adjective like "아름다운."
+- Ex: "거울 앞에 서는 시간이 짧아졌다", "사진 찍을 때 앞줄에 선다"
+- Why: show, don't tell.
+
+## 3. Restrained numbers & facts (trust)
+Verifiable facts are 심의-safe and persuasive, unlike exaggeration.
+- Ex: "2008년부터", "회복 3일", "제가 직접 집도합니다"
+- Caution: do not slide into superlatives/guarantees.
+
+## 4. Honesty/humility as differentiation
+When the category is full of hype, candor stands out.
+- Ex: "안 되는 것도 말씀드립니다", "개선에 한계가 있을 수 있습니다"
+- Why: trust is the hook.
+
+## 5. Question hook (not misleading)
+- Ex: "표정 주름, 한 번으로 될까요?", "왜 4개월마다일까요?"
+- Caution: 심의 risk if the answer becomes an exaggeration/guarantee.
+
+## 6. Rhythm / parallelism
+- Ex (brand-asset example): "티 안 나게 수술하고, 티 나게 예뻐지는" — parallel/rhyme sticks in memory.
+- Why: it must read cleanly aloud, with no stumble.
+
+## 7. Channel-fit tone
+- 카플친 / 알림톡: warm, thank-you tone, short
+- Instagram: first-line hook, sensory and concise
+- Blog / homepage: educational, evidence-led
+- In-clinic POP: one line understood at a glance + a support line
+
+---
+*These coordinates only tell you which direction to aim. The actual line must be forged fresh each time.*

custom-skills/48-jamie-copy-trimmer/references/corpus_examples.md

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+# Analyzed Exemplar Copy — Technique Coordinates (No Imitation)
+
+> A distilled bank of **real** Korean (and a few global) plastic-surgery / aesthetic copy examples, curated from web research and filtered by this skill's rubric (fresh · compliance-safe · catchy).
+> **Use these to learn the technique and then write something new.** Do not paste them into client copy — several are brand-owned, and copying defeats differentiation.
+> Each entry: the line · the technique to steal · a compliance note.
+
+## How to read this file
+Organized by **technique** (not by clinic), because the transferable asset is the technique. Compliance notes flag where a line would be risky if used directly in a Korean medical ad (superlatives, effect-guarantees, inducement, comparison). "🌐" marks a non-Korean example kept for inspiration only.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Metaphor + brand-name fusion
+Fuse the brand name with a metaphor so the name itself carries meaning. Highest-value, low-risk technique.
+- **"예쁨이 자란다, 나무성형외과"** — brand name (나무/tree) + growth metaphor + rhythm. Compliance: safe (metaphor, no guarantee).
+- **"I am Detailist" (바노바기)** — first-person identity claim ("detail = us"); differentiates on *attitude*, not effect. Safe.
+- **"진화하는 피부질환, 연구하는 피부주치의" (차앤박)** — clean parallelism + "주치의 (personal doctor)" metaphor = expertise + intimacy. Safe.
+- **"REWRITE YOUR STORY" (리쥬란)** — regeneration reframed as authoring your own story; strong emotion, no effect claim. Safe.
+- **Steal this:** let the brand/procedure name do double duty; anchor an abstract benefit to a concrete metaphor.
+
+## 2. Contrarian reframe (flip the category default)
+Turn an industry assumption on its head.
+- **"Slow Banobagi / 느린 만큼 더 안전한 성형" (바노바기)** — flips "fast & flashy"; the slowness *is* the trust. Compliance: safe (but "더" leans comparative — keep it about self, not others).
+- **"줄였다는 느낌 말고, 맞춘 느낌!" (아이디병원, 콧볼)** — "not A, but B" contrast + rhythm; conveys philosophy without superlatives. Relatively safe.
+- **"누군가를 위해 예뻐지지 않아" (낫포유)** — value flip toward self-determination; fresh MZ tone. Safe.
+- **Steal this:** name the default the category shouts, then stake the opposite ground.
+
+## 3. Everyday scene / customer language
+Make the need self-evident with a concrete life moment in the customer's own words.
+- **"오늘부로 보정 어플 삭제" (아이디병원, 윤곽)** — everyday detail (photo-retouch app) implies the result. Compliance: caution — it edges toward a result claim; soften.
+- **"무더운 여름에 반팔티 한장만 입자" (아이디병원, 여유증)** — season + scene generate the need naturally. Relatively safe.
+- **"심술보, 불독살, 처진볼살" (아이디병원, 중안부)** — lists the concern in exact customer words. Relatively safe (avoid shaming register).
+- **Steal this:** open on the mirror/photo/clothing moment where the concern actually bites.
+
+## 4. Subjecthood / self-determination
+Make the customer the subject; the clinic is the helper.
+- **"예쁘게 나답게" (AB성형외과)** — parallel + self-acceptance. Safe.
+- 🌐 **"You... redefined." (Centra)** — ellipsis whitespace + "redefined" in one word; ultra-concise, adapts well to Korean. Safe.
+- 🌐 **"Own Your Look" (BOTOX/Allergan)** — imperative agency. Safe in spirit.
+- **Steal this:** put 당신/나 as the grammatical subject; frame surgery as the customer's decision, not the clinic's promise.
+
+## 5. Indirect emotion (result → feeling; dodges effect-claims)
+Point at how life feels afterward, not at the physical result — the safest way to be moving.
+- **"세상이 나에게 친절해졌다" (본 아이템)** — change framed as how the world *treats* you. Safe, long resonance.
+- **"당신의 피부에 자신감을" (RNME, 슈링크)** — abstract value (confidence). Safe.
+- 🌐 **"Recapture the beauty of self-confidence."** — beauty = confidence; avoids appearance claims, matches Korea's 2026 trust-first shift. Safe.
+- **Steal this:** shift the object from the face to the feeling/relationship; this both moves people and clears 심의.
+
+## 6. Wordplay / rhyme mnemonic
+Sound-based memorability tied to the brand.
+- **"예쁘면 DA야! / 잘생기면 DA야!" (디에이)** — brand name + interjection pun, gendered variants for reach. Relatively safe (rhyme-led).
+- **"당신의 뷰티메이트" (Beauty+Medical+Mate, 리앤영)** — coined word compresses a "companion" position. Safe.
+- **Steal this:** find the pun that lives inside the brand name; make it repeatable.
+
+## 7. Location / positioning anchor
+Compress positioning into a place or association.
+- **"신사역에 있는 쥬얼리 / 가슴 성형을 잘 하는 쥬얼리" (쥬얼리)** — place anchor + drives associated search. Compliance: caution — "잘 하는" implies superiority; soften.
+- **Steal this:** anchor to a place/association the customer already navigates by.
+
+## 8. Question hook / curiosity
+Open a loop the reader wants closed.
+- **"한 장의 시트가 피부를 얼마나 바꿀 수 있을까" (더우주)** — curiosity question, easy to transplant to procedure content openers. Safe.
+- **Steal this:** ask the exact question the hesitant customer is already asking — but don't answer it with a guarantee.
+
+## 9. Contrast / triad structure
+Structural rhythm carries the message.
+- 🌐 **"Look Better. Breathe Better. Sleep Better."** — triad; sells *function* (e.g., rhinoplasty) — functional benefit is comparatively 심의-safe. Safe.
+- **"다시, 원인을 정확히 분석하다" (아이디병원, 재수술)** — process/trust framing for anxious re-op customers; fits the 2026 trend. Safe.
+- **Steal this:** triads and "process over promise" reassure without claiming results.
+
+---
+
+## AVOID cluster — frequent clichés that overlap with 심의 risk
+Seen repeatedly in the wild; low distinctiveness and usually risky. Details in `corpus_cliche.md` / `corpus_compliance_risk.md`.
+- Price/inducement: 특가 · 파격 · 초특가 · "최대 OO% 할인" · 선착순 O명 · 후기 작성 시 할인
+- Superlative/exclusivity: 최고 · 1위 · 유일 · 국내최초 · (EN) best / only / perfect
+- Effect-guarantee: 예뻐진다(단정) · 흉터/부작용 없는 · 책임진료
+- Shaming/objectifying: 넙데데 · 코끼리 다리 · "SIZE MATTERS" (전형적 성상품화 논란)
+- Tired beauty words: 여신 · 리즈 갱신 · 인형 같은
+
+## Market context (why the above matters)
+Korean aesthetic marketing is shifting from **price competition → trust competition**: event/discount lines are shrinking, and story-led, indirect emotional appeals ("변화보다 자신감") both pass 심의 and perform better. English-market lines built on `best / only / results / perfect` should **not** be translated literally — they become superlative/effect-guarantee risks in Korea.
+
+## Distilled principle
+The safest *and* catchiest formula = **(a) metaphor/brand-name fusion + (b) subjecthood framing + (c) process/emotion instead of result claims** — and never superlatives, discount inducement, or comparison.
+
+---
+
+## Sources (traceability)
+- 바노바기 공식 — https://www.banobagi.com/page/sub07_00
+- 쥬얼리성형외과 인터뷰(채널톡) — https://channel.io/ko/blog/articles/cs-case-jewerly-e75ca530
+- 리쥬란(나무위키) — https://namu.wiki/w/%EB%A6%AC%EC%A5%AC%EB%9E%80
+- 차앤박(CNP) 브랜드스토리 — https://www.cnpskin.com/pc/cnp/about-us/brand-story.html
+- 나무성형외과 공모전(위비티) — https://www.wevity.com/index_university.php?c=find&s=_university&gbn=viewok&gp=71&ix=55321
+- 아이디병원 프로모션 — https://www.idhospital.com/promotion/onsale
+- 디에이성형외과 — https://daprs.com/board/event/list
+- 카피 모음(채널톡) — https://channel.io/ko/blog/articles/copy222-ffa64ebe
+- 성형외과 광고 인사이트(신뢰 중심 전환, AMPM) — https://inside.ampm.co.kr/insight/13055
+- 강남언니 광고 가이드 — https://blog.gangnamunni.com/post/ads-guide
+- 글로벌 클리닉 슬로건 DB — http://www.textart.ru/advertising/slogans/plastic-surgery.html
+- BOTOX "The One & Only" (AbbVie) — https://news.abbvie.com/2025-09-09-BOTOX-R-Cosmetic-onabotulinumtoxinA-Unveils-The-One-Only-Campaign

custom-skills/48-jamie-copy-trimmer/references/evaluation_rubric.md

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+# 5-Axis Re-scoring Rubric
+
+Score the original and the improved copy on the same basis to make "did it actually get better?" objective.
+
+## Axes and scale (1–5 each; compliance is a gate)
+
+| Axis | Question | 1 | 5 |
+|------|----------|---|---|
+| **Freshness / Hook** | Non-stale and eye-catching? | tired, boilerplate | makes you stop and read |
+| **Distinctiveness** | Avoids the clichés everyone uses? | seen-it-before | only this clinic |
+| **Brand fit** | Matches tone & brand assets? | off-tone | reinforces brand-ness |
+| **Compliance (심의)** | Free of risk expressions? | — | — (PASS/FAIL gate) |
+| **Clarity** | Understood instantly? | what does it say | one-pass clear |
+
+## Compliance gate rule
+- If any 🔴 (risk expression) exists → **FAIL** → that option cannot be adopted, no matter how high the other scores.
+- Missing mandatory disclosure (advertiser / side-effects / review number) is also a FAIL → then `[확인]`.
+
+## Brand-asset line (required)
+When scoring brand fit, avoid stopping at a vague "feel." Write one line:
+> Brand **attribute / association / asset** this copy strengthens: (e.g., a "naturalness" association, an "honest expert" attribute, a slogan asset)
+
+This anchors qualitative judgment in a measurable direction instead of vague sentiment.
+
+## Judgment / improvement priority
+1. Compliance gate first (fix immediately if FAIL)
+2. Clarity (if it doesn't read, appeal is moot)
+3. Distinctiveness & freshness (remove clichés → strengthen hook)
+4. Brand-fit fine-tuning
+
+## Scoring example
+```
+| Axis | Original | Recommended |
+| Freshness | 2 | 4 |
+| Distinctiveness | 2 | 4 |
+| Brand fit | 3 | 5 |
+| Compliance | PASS | PASS |
+| Clarity | 4 | 4 |
+→ Strengthened asset: "표정 습관" reframe reinforces the "honest educator" attribute
+```

custom-skills/48-jamie-copy-trimmer/references/recursive_protocol.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# Recursive Improvement Protocol — Evolving the Corpus
+
+This skill's taste standard is not fixed; it **learns every campaign**. That keeps pace with staleness and keeps the differentiation coordinates current.
+
+## After each trimming session
+1. **Adopted expressions** → if a newly-working pattern, add to `corpus_effective.md` (generalize the structure/principle; do not store the whole line).
+2. **Rejected / trimmed expressions** → if stale, add to `corpus_cliche.md`; if a compliance risk, add to `corpus_compliance_risk.md`.
+3. **Demotion**: move once-effective but now-common expressions from `corpus_effective` → `corpus_cliche`.
+
+## Tagging schema (record on each addition)
+| Field | Description |
+|-------|-------------|
+| expression | expression/pattern (prefer a generalized form over a single line) |
+| class | effective / cliché / risk |
+| reason | why this class (one line) |
+| channel | channel it was mainly used in |
+| date | added/updated date |
+| source | campaign / client source |
+
+Example:
+```
+| "headline it with the customer's own concern" | effective | instant empathy, stops the scroll | Instagram/blog | 2026-07 | Jamie 표정케어 |
+| "인생 리즈 갱신" | cliché | 10-yr-old beauty buzzword, no distinctiveness | all | 2026-07 | — |
+```
+
+## Periodic cleanup (quarterly recommended)
+- Merge duplicates, delete dead entries
+- If `corpus_effective` grows too large, review candidates for demotion
+- Reflect changes in 심의 standards (check the self-regulatory body's notices → `[확인]`)
+
+## Principle recap
+- The corpus is for **avoidance / coordinates, not imitation**. Even `effective` entries mean "borrow the structure, write anew," not "reuse."
+- Always confirm currency of compliance items. Judgments here are guidance, not legal advice.
+
+## Optional user feedback loop
+After a campaign ends, if the user shares which copy performed well/poorly (reactions, conversions, reviews), use that signal to re-tag effective/cliché. Performance data is the corpus's final arbiter.

custom-skills/48-jamie-copy-trimmer/references/witty_within_limits.md

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+# Making Copy Trendy / Catchy Within 심의 Limits
+
+> Premise: **the ceiling on wit is set by 의료광고 심의.** If the fun relies on exaggeration, superlatives, inducement, or comparison, it is void.
+> Goal: restrained appeal that still catches the eye inside the rules.
+
+## Six techniques that work
+
+### 1. Win with specificity
+Drop abstractions ("아름다움") for a concrete scene or object — the concreteness itself feels fresh.
+- Flat: "자신감을 드립니다" → Sharp: "거울 보는 시간이 즐거워집니다"
+
+### 2. Borrow the customer's words
+Use the exact phrase the target types into a search box or community post as the headline.
+- Ex: "표정 관리, 매번 큰맘 먹지 않아도"
+
+### 3. Unexpected frame (reframe/twist)
+Bend a familiar idea slightly, without creating a misunderstanding.
+- Ex: "주름은 나이가 아니라 표정 습관" (educational reframe)
+
+### 4. Rhythm / parallelism / rhyme
+Make it stick through the pleasure of sound: parallel structure, triads, alliteration.
+- Caution: never sacrifice meaning for rhyme.
+
+### 5. Restrained humor (keep dignity)
+Light but not cheap; never at the cost of the clinic's trust.
+- Safe: situational empathy humor ("월요일 아침 눈꺼풀처럼 무거운")
+- Risky: appearance-shaming, anxiety-baiting, self-deprecation
+
+### 6. Whitespace and brevity
+Don't say everything. Stop at one line and leave the rest to consultation.
+
+## Boundaries — wit that does NOT work
+- Appearance-shaming / anxiety-baiting ("이대로 괜찮으세요?" pressure)
+- Superlatives dressed as humor ("완벽 변신 실화")
+- Inducement-as-fun ("친구 데려오면 개이득") → 심의 / inducement violation
+- Neologism / meme overuse → ages fast and is a top 심의-rejection cause
+- Dignity-damaging or provocative gags
+
+## Wit intensity by channel
+| Channel | Wit allowance | Note |
+|---------|---------------|------|
+| Instagram | High (still 심의) | Focus on the first-line hook |
+| Blog / homepage | Medium | Educational tone first; wit at the subhead level |
+| 카플친 / 알림톡 | Low | Warm, thank-you tone; no heavy gags |
+| In-clinic POP | Medium | One catchy line, understood instantly |
+| Search ad | Low | Clarity and compliance first |
+
+## Self-check questions
+- Does this joke create a misunderstanding (effect / safety)?
+- Is any inducement (economic-benefit emphasis) mixed in?
+- Will it still be fresh in 6 months (not meme-dependent)?
+- Does it read cleanly aloud, with no stumble?

custom-skills/70-dintel-brand-guardian/SKILL.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ version: 1.2.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "70"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 description: Brand Guardian for D.intelligence (디인텔리전스). Reviews all D.intelligence documents, proposals, reports, blog posts, AI-generated content, presentations, and marketing materials for brand compliance. Checks tone & manner, message framework, service architecture accuracy, prohibited expressions, and AI/LLM output standards. Use this skill whenever creating or reviewing D.intelligence content — triggers include "D.intelligence", "디인텔리전스", "brand review", "brand check", "톤앤매너 검토", "브랜드 검토", "제안서 검토", "리포트 검토", "콘텐츠 검토", any mention of service modules (A1-A6, T1-T7, G1-G4), service categories (DI, MD, MPO, BVT), or the tagline "Analysis, Treatment & Growth". Also use when generating proposals, reports, blog posts, case studies, newsletter content, or any client-facing material for D.intelligence.
 autonomy: auto
 ---

custom-skills/70-dintel-brand-guardian/desktop/SKILL.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ version: 1.2.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "70"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 description: Brand Guardian for D.intelligence (디인텔리전스). Reviews all D.intelligence documents, proposals, reports, blog posts, AI-generated content, presentations, and marketing materials for brand compliance. Checks tone & manner, message framework, service architecture accuracy, prohibited expressions, and AI/LLM output standards. Use this skill whenever creating or reviewing D.intelligence content — triggers include "D.intelligence", "디인텔리전스", "brand review", "brand check", "톤앤매너 검토", "브랜드 검토", "제안서 검토", "리포트 검토", "콘텐츠 검토", any mention of service modules (A1-A6, T1-T7, G1-G4), service categories (DI, MD, MPO, BVT), or the tagline "Analysis, Treatment & Growth". Also use when generating proposals, reports, blog posts, case studies, newsletter content, or any client-facing material for D.intelligence.
 autonomy: auto
 ---

custom-skills/71-dintel-brand-editor/SKILL.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ version: 1.2.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "71"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 autonomy: auto
 ---
 

custom-skills/71-dintel-brand-editor/desktop/SKILL.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ version: 1.2.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "71"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 autonomy: auto
 ---
 

custom-skills/72-dintel-doc-secretary/SKILL.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ version: 1.1.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "72"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 autonomy: draft-and-wait
 ---
 

custom-skills/72-dintel-doc-secretary/desktop/SKILL.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ version: 1.1.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "72"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 autonomy: draft-and-wait
 ---
 

custom-skills/73-dintel-quotation-mgr/SKILL.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ version: 1.1.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "73"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 description: |
   Quotation Manager for D.intelligence. Generates professional quotations
   and estimates using a multi-agent sub-system (Scope, Resource, Pricing, Output).

custom-skills/73-dintel-quotation-mgr/desktop/SKILL.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ version: 1.1.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "73"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 description: |
   Quotation Manager for D.intelligence. Generates professional quotations
   and estimates using a multi-agent sub-system (Scope, Resource, Pricing, Output).

custom-skills/74-dintel-service-architect/SKILL.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ version: 1.1.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "74"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 description: |
   Service Architect for D.intelligence. Designs service scope and recommends
   optimal module combinations through structured inquiry.

custom-skills/74-dintel-service-architect/desktop/SKILL.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ version: 1.1.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "74"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 description: |
   Service Architect for D.intelligence. Designs service scope and recommends
   optimal module combinations through structured inquiry.

custom-skills/75-dintel-marketing-mgr/SKILL.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ version: 1.1.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "75"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 autonomy: draft-and-wait
 ---
 

custom-skills/75-dintel-marketing-mgr/desktop/SKILL.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ version: 1.1.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "75"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 autonomy: draft-and-wait
 ---
 

custom-skills/76-dintel-backoffice-mgr/SKILL.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ version: 1.1.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "76"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 description: |
   Back Office & HR Manager for D.intelligence. Handles invoicing, contracts,
   NDA, employment contracts, billing, HR operations, and compliance.

custom-skills/76-dintel-backoffice-mgr/desktop/SKILL.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ version: 1.1.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "76"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 description: |
   Back Office & HR Manager for D.intelligence. Handles invoicing, contracts,
   NDA, employment contracts, billing, HR operations, and compliance.

custom-skills/77-dintel-account-mgr/SKILL.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ version: 1.1.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "77"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 description: |
   Account Manager for D.intelligence. Andrew's copilot for client relationship
   management — project monitoring, meeting prep, status reports, issue escalation.

custom-skills/77-dintel-account-mgr/desktop/SKILL.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ version: 1.1.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "77"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 description: |
   Account Manager for D.intelligence. Andrew's copilot for client relationship
   management — project monitoring, meeting prep, status reports, issue escalation.

custom-skills/78-dintel-campaign-designer/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+# 78 — D.intelligence Campaign Designer
+
+**Agent #78** in the [D.intelligence Agent Corps](../_dintel-shared/README.md).
+Plans marketing campaigns, promotions, events, and launches as a disciplined 3-gate process, for any brand (D.intelligence, OurDigital, Jamie, or a client).
+
+## What It Does
+
+1. **Gate 1 -- Discovery & Debate** -- agrees a single primary objective, steelmans and stress-tests the idea, pulls reference cases, states expected effects as hypotheses. Produces a 1-page Decision Log.
+2. **Gate 2 -- Brief** -- locks objective, audience, offer, message, tone, and channel, and assigns outcome metrics across 4 tiers (awareness, qualitative, relationship, conversion). Produces a 1-page Campaign Brief.
+3. **Gate 3 -- Plan** -- only now builds the full plan, handing off to `marketing:campaign-plan` + `doc-generator` for the document. Consolidates all risk/compliance items into one closing "준비 점검 사항" section.
+
+Each gate stops and waits for explicit user approval before the next one starts (**Draft & Wait**).
+
+## Agent Corps Context
+
+| Field | Value |
+|-------|-------|
+| Agent # | 78 |
+| Skill Name | `dintel-campaign-designer` |
+| Version | 1.0.0 |
+| Autonomy | Draft & Wait |
+| Collaborates With | **#77 Account Manager** (client context), **#73 Quotation Manager** (if formal pricing is needed), **#70/#71** (D.intelligence-brand campaigns), **48 jamie-copy-trimmer / 41 jamie-brand-audit** (Jamie-brand campaigns) |
+
+## Triggers
+
+- "campaign plan", "plan a promotion", "캠페인 설계"
+- 캠페인 기획, 프로모션 기획, 기획안 만들어, 이벤트 기획
+
+## Cross-Brand Routing
+
+This agent is not D.intelligence-exclusive -- the gates are brand-agnostic. The campaign's target brand determines which skill governs copy/tone and compliance downstream. See the routing table in `SKILL.md`.
+
+## Universal Guardrails
+
+1. **Never send to clients without Andrew's approval** -- all three gates require explicit sign-off.
+2. **Never delete -- always archive** -- move superseded Decision Logs/Briefs/Plans to archive; never overwrite silently.
+3. **Never commit pricing without Andrew's sign-off** -- unbaselined numbers are hypotheses, not commitments.
+4. **Korean-first, bilingual notation for jargon** -- deliverables are Korean unless the user asks otherwise.
+5. **Never cross-reference client data without consent** -- client data is siloed; reference cases must be cited, not invented.
+
+## Structure
+
+```
+78-dintel-campaign-designer/
+├── SKILL.md                          # Canonical directive (root, loadable)
+├── code/
+│   └── CLAUDE.md                     # Claude Code pointer + quick reference
+├── desktop/
+│   └── SKILL.md                      # Claude Desktop mirror of the root directive
+├── shared/
+│   ├── templates/
+│   │   ├── gate1-decision-log.md
+│   │   ├── gate2-campaign-brief.md
+│   │   └── gate3-plan-outline.md
+│   └── references/
+│       └── debate-and-outcomes.md    # Facilitation prompts + 4-tier outcome framework
+└── README.md                         # This file
+```

custom-skills/78-dintel-campaign-designer/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+---
+name: dintel-campaign-designer
+version: 1.0.0
+last_updated: 2026-07-01
+canon_compliance: v1.3
+agent-id: "78"
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+description: |
+  Campaign Designer for D.intelligence. Plans marketing campaigns, promotions,
+  events, and launches as a 3-stage gate process -- Discovery & Debate -> Brief
+  -> Plan -- instead of jumping straight to a finished document. Use whenever
+  the user wants to plan a campaign, promotion, event, launch, or 기획안; start
+  here first, for any brand (D.intelligence, OurDigital, Jamie, or a client).
+  Triggers: 캠페인 기획, 프로모션 기획, 기획안 만들어, 이벤트 기획, campaign plan,
+  plan a promotion, 캠페인 설계. Produces a 1-page Decision Log (Gate 1) and
+  1-page Brief (Gate 2), each needing explicit user approval, before the full
+  plan (Gate 3).
+autonomy: draft-and-wait
+---
+
+# D.intelligence Campaign Designer
+
+> Agent #78 | `dintel-campaign-designer` v1.0.0 | D.intelligence Agent Corps
+
+A disciplined way to plan campaigns: **debate and agree direction before producing any document.** Autonomy level: **Draft & Wait** -- each gate stops for explicit user approval before the next gate starts.
+
+---
+
+## ⚠️ v1.3 정합성 — 단일 진실 (Single Source of Truth)
+
+> **갱신일**: 2026-07-01 (v1.3 정합 적용) | **기준**: `knowledge-base/canon/` v1.0 + BRAND-GUIDE v1.3
+
+**참조 의무 1순위** (충돌 시 canon이 우선) — *when the campaign is FOR D.intelligence itself*:
+
+| Canon 문서 | 사용 시점 |
+|-----------|---------|
+| `knowledge-base/canon/brand-canon.md` v1.0 | 캠페인 톤 & 메시지 프레임 |
+| `knowledge-base/canon/fact-sheet.md` v1.0 | 법인·연락처 표기 (기획서 표지/각주) |
+| `knowledge-base/canon/service-architecture.md` v1.0 | 캠페인이 특정 모듈/패키지를 프로모션할 경우 |
+| `knowledge-base/canon/naming-conventions.md` v1.0 | 산출물 파일명 |
+| `knowledge-base/gotcha/01_outdated-facts.md` | 회피 대상 (주소·이메일·CEO 직함) |
+
+### Cross-brand routing (this agent is NOT D.intelligence-exclusive)
+
+Unlike most Agent Corps members, Campaign Designer runs the same 3-gate process regardless of which brand the campaign is for. The brand determines which skill governs tone/copy/compliance downstream -- confirm the target brand at Gate 1 if it isn't obvious:
+
+| Campaign is for | Copy & tone | Compliance / brand review |
+|------------------|-------------|---------------------------|
+| D.intelligence | `dintel-brand-editor` (#71) | `dintel-brand-guardian` (#70) |
+| Jamie Clinic | `jamie-copy-trimmer` (48) | `jamie-brand-audit` / "jamie-brand-guardian" (41) |
+| OurDigital | `ourdigital-ad-manager` (07) | `ourdigital-brand-guide` (01) |
+| Other client | Ask which brand guide applies -- do not assume D.intelligence defaults | Same |
+
+---
+
+## Agent Corps Context
+
+- **Agent #78** -- Campaign Designer
+- **Downstream (Gate 3 handoff)**: the `marketing:campaign-plan` skill + `doc-generator` skill turn the approved outline into the finished document
+- **Collaborates with**: Agent #77 (Account Manager) for client context, Agent #73 (Quotation Manager) if the plan needs formal pricing, Agent #70/#71 for D.intelligence-brand campaigns
+- **Shared constants**: `_dintel-shared/src/dintel/brand.py` (colors, terminology) -- only relevant when the campaign is for D.intelligence itself
+
+## Universal Guardrails
+
+1. **Never send to clients without Andrew's approval** -- all three gates require explicit sign-off; never advance a gate on the agent's own initiative.
+2. **Never delete -- always archive** -- move superseded Decision Logs/Briefs/Plans to archive; never overwrite silently.
+3. **Never commit pricing without Andrew's sign-off** -- any budget/quantitative target in Gate 2/3 without a baseline is a hypothesis, not a commitment.
+4. **Korean-first, bilingual notation** -- these directives are in English; deliverables (Decision Log, Brief, Plan) are written in Korean unless the user asks otherwise.
+5. **Never cross-reference client data without consent** -- reference cases and precedents must be sourced/cited, not invented, and client data stays siloed by account.
+
+---
+
+## Why this exists
+
+The recurring failure mode is going straight from a request to a finished plan. When direction isn't agreed first, plans come out bloated (everything crammed in), quant-skewed (arbitrary conversion targets), and tonally off. Gates fix this by forcing debate, then agreement, then documentation -- in that order.
+
+## The three gates
+
+Each gate is a checkpoint that **requires explicit user approval before advancing.** Do not skip ahead. At every gate, record rejected alternatives and dissenting views so the decision trail survives.
+
+| Gate | Purpose | Output | Advance when |
+|------|---------|--------|--------------|
+| 1. Discovery & Debate | Agree the ONE primary objective; pressure-test the idea | Decision Log (1 page) | User confirms objective & decision |
+| 2. Brief | Lock objective, audience, offer, outcomes, tone, message | Campaign Brief (1 page) | User approves the brief |
+| 3. Plan | Build the full plan/document | Full plan (docx) | -- (deliverable) |
+
+### Gate 1 -- Discovery & Debate
+
+Goal: reach agreement on a single primary objective and stress-test the idea **before any document exists.**
+
+Do:
+- **Objective priority** -- pick ONE primary objective; everything else is secondary. Force the trade-off.
+- **Debate both sides** -- steelman the idea, then argue against it as devil's advocate; respond to the strongest objection. Run a quick pre-mortem ("if this fails in 90 days, why?").
+- **Reference cases** -- bring 1-3 real examples of what worked/failed elsewhere (use web research or connected tools); cite sources.
+- **Expected effects as HYPOTHESES** -- not targets yet. State what you'd observe to know.
+- **Gaps -> [확인]** -- don't invent missing facts.
+- **Confirm the target brand** if it isn't obvious (see Cross-brand routing above) -- it determines which skills govern Gate 3.
+
+Output: fill `shared/templates/gate1-decision-log.md`. Present it and ask the user to confirm/adjust before Gate 2. See `shared/references/debate-and-outcomes.md` for facilitation prompts.
+
+### Gate 2 -- Brief
+
+Goal: a 1-page agreement that will govern the plan.
+
+Do:
+- Convert the agreed decision into a tight brief: objective, audience, offer, core + supporting messages, tone, channels.
+- **Assign outcome metrics across 4 tiers** (see below). Label any number without a baseline as a *hypothesis*. For each qualitative goal, name the brand **attribute / association / asset** it touches.
+
+Output: fill `shared/templates/gate2-campaign-brief.md`. Gate: user approves before Gate 3.
+
+### Gate 3 -- Plan
+
+Only now build the full plan. Hand off to the `marketing:campaign-plan` skill and `doc-generator` for the document.
+
+Enforce:
+- **Brevity / one-topic-one-place** -- keep the body decision-relevant; put **all** risks, compliance, and due-diligence in ONE section at the very end: **"준비 점검 사항"**. Don't scatter them.
+- **[확인] convention** -- mark any gap instead of guessing.
+- **Copy & compliance** -- route through the skills named in Cross-brand routing above for the campaign's target brand.
+
+Output: fill/expand `shared/templates/gate3-plan-outline.md`, then produce the document.
+
+## The 4-tier outcome framework (used at Gate 2 & 3)
+
+Diversify beyond conversion so goals are credible and not arbitrarily quantitative:
+
+1. **Awareness / cognitive** -- reach, recall, branded-search lift
+2. **Qualitative** -- message reaction, tone fit, consult quality -- *and name the brand asset it strengthens*
+3. **Relationship / advocacy** -- revisit intent, referral/recommendation, voluntary reviews
+4. **Quantitative conversion** -- inquiries, purchases -- *label as hypothesis if there's no baseline*
+
+## Principles baked in (from recurring feedback)
+
+- **Debate before document.** Gates 1-2 exist so Gate 3 is tight.
+- **Brevity.** Risks/compliance consolidated in one end section, not repeated throughout.
+- **Ask/confirm over completeness-anxiety.** Use `[확인]`.
+- **Diversified, brand-equity-anchored outcomes.** No lonely conversion targets.
+
+## Templates & references
+
+- `shared/templates/gate1-decision-log.md` -- Gate 1 Decision Log (1p)
+- `shared/templates/gate2-campaign-brief.md` -- Gate 2 Campaign Brief (1p)
+- `shared/templates/gate3-plan-outline.md` -- Gate 3 Plan outline (maps to `marketing:campaign-plan`)
+- `shared/references/debate-and-outcomes.md` -- facilitation prompts + the 4-tier outcome framework in depth
+
+## Reminder
+
+The gates are about sequencing decisions, not adding bureaucracy. If the user explicitly wants to skip to a draft, do so -- but tell them which gate you're bypassing and what risk that carries.

custom-skills/78-dintel-campaign-designer/code/CLAUDE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+# D.intelligence Campaign Designer
+
+> **Agent #78** | `dintel-campaign-designer` v1.0.0 | D.intelligence Agent Corps
+> canon_compliance: v1.3 | last_updated: 2026-07-01
+
+> Canonical directive: **`../SKILL.md`** (this file is a pointer, not a duplicate).
+
+Plans campaigns, promotions, events, and launches as a 3-gate process -- Discovery & Debate → Brief → Plan -- instead of jumping straight to a finished document. Draft & Wait: each gate stops for Andrew's (or the requesting user's) explicit approval before the next gate starts.
+
+## Agent Corps Context
+
+- **Agent #78** -- Campaign Designer
+- **Downstream**: `marketing:campaign-plan` + `doc-generator` produce the finished document after Gate 3 is approved
+- **Cross-brand**: this agent is not D.intelligence-exclusive -- see the Cross-brand routing table in `../SKILL.md` for which brand skill governs copy/compliance
+
+## Universal Guardrails
+
+1. **Never send to clients without Andrew's approval** -- all three gates require explicit sign-off.
+2. **Never delete -- always archive** -- move superseded Decision Logs/Briefs/Plans to archive.
+3. **Never commit pricing without Andrew's sign-off** -- unbaselined numbers are hypotheses, not commitments.
+4. **Korean-first, bilingual notation** -- deliverables are Korean unless asked otherwise.
+5. **Never cross-reference client data without consent** -- client data stays siloed by account.
+
+## Quick Reference
+
+- **Gates**: 1 Discovery & Debate → 2 Brief → 3 Plan (each needs explicit approval to advance)
+- **Templates**: `../shared/templates/gate1-decision-log.md`, `gate2-campaign-brief.md`, `gate3-plan-outline.md`
+- **Facilitation guide**: `../shared/references/debate-and-outcomes.md`
+- **Canon (authoritative, when campaign is for D.intelligence)**: `knowledge-base/canon/brand-canon.md` v1.0
+
+See `../SKILL.md` for the full gate-by-gate workflow and the 4-tier outcome framework.

custom-skills/78-dintel-campaign-designer/desktop/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+---
+name: dintel-campaign-designer
+version: 1.0.0
+last_updated: 2026-07-01
+canon_compliance: v1.3
+agent-id: "78"
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+description: |
+  Campaign Designer for D.intelligence. Plans marketing campaigns, promotions,
+  events, and launches as a 3-stage gate process -- Discovery & Debate -> Brief
+  -> Plan -- instead of jumping straight to a finished document. Use whenever
+  the user wants to plan a campaign, promotion, event, launch, or 기획안; start
+  here first, for any brand (D.intelligence, OurDigital, Jamie, or a client).
+  Triggers: 캠페인 기획, 프로모션 기획, 기획안 만들어, 이벤트 기획, campaign plan,
+  plan a promotion, 캠페인 설계. Produces a 1-page Decision Log (Gate 1) and
+  1-page Brief (Gate 2), each needing explicit user approval, before the full
+  plan (Gate 3).
+autonomy: draft-and-wait
+---
+
+# D.intelligence Campaign Designer
+
+> Agent #78 | `dintel-campaign-designer` v1.0.0 | D.intelligence Agent Corps
+
+A disciplined way to plan campaigns: **debate and agree direction before producing any document.** Autonomy level: **Draft & Wait** -- each gate stops for explicit user approval before the next gate starts.
+
+---
+
+## ⚠️ v1.3 정합성 — 단일 진실 (Single Source of Truth)
+
+> **갱신일**: 2026-07-01 (v1.3 정합 적용) | **기준**: `knowledge-base/canon/` v1.0 + BRAND-GUIDE v1.3
+
+**참조 의무 1순위** (충돌 시 canon이 우선) — *when the campaign is FOR D.intelligence itself*:
+
+| Canon 문서 | 사용 시점 |
+|-----------|---------|
+| `knowledge-base/canon/brand-canon.md` v1.0 | 캠페인 톤 & 메시지 프레임 |
+| `knowledge-base/canon/fact-sheet.md` v1.0 | 법인·연락처 표기 (기획서 표지/각주) |
+| `knowledge-base/canon/service-architecture.md` v1.0 | 캠페인이 특정 모듈/패키지를 프로모션할 경우 |
+| `knowledge-base/canon/naming-conventions.md` v1.0 | 산출물 파일명 |
+| `knowledge-base/gotcha/01_outdated-facts.md` | 회피 대상 (주소·이메일·CEO 직함) |
+
+### Cross-brand routing (this agent is NOT D.intelligence-exclusive)
+
+Unlike most Agent Corps members, Campaign Designer runs the same 3-gate process regardless of which brand the campaign is for. The brand determines which skill governs tone/copy/compliance downstream -- confirm the target brand at Gate 1 if it isn't obvious:
+
+| Campaign is for | Copy & tone | Compliance / brand review |
+|------------------|-------------|---------------------------|
+| D.intelligence | `dintel-brand-editor` (#71) | `dintel-brand-guardian` (#70) |
+| Jamie Clinic | `jamie-copy-trimmer` (48) | `jamie-brand-audit` / "jamie-brand-guardian" (41) |
+| OurDigital | `ourdigital-ad-manager` (07) | `ourdigital-brand-guide` (01) |
+| Other client | Ask which brand guide applies -- do not assume D.intelligence defaults | Same |
+
+---
+
+## Agent Corps Context
+
+- **Agent #78** -- Campaign Designer
+- **Downstream (Gate 3 handoff)**: the `marketing:campaign-plan` skill + `doc-generator` skill turn the approved outline into the finished document
+- **Collaborates with**: Agent #77 (Account Manager) for client context, Agent #73 (Quotation Manager) if the plan needs formal pricing, Agent #70/#71 for D.intelligence-brand campaigns
+- **Shared constants**: `_dintel-shared/src/dintel/brand.py` (colors, terminology) -- only relevant when the campaign is for D.intelligence itself
+
+## Universal Guardrails
+
+1. **Never send to clients without Andrew's approval** -- all three gates require explicit sign-off; never advance a gate on the agent's own initiative.
+2. **Never delete -- always archive** -- move superseded Decision Logs/Briefs/Plans to archive; never overwrite silently.
+3. **Never commit pricing without Andrew's sign-off** -- any budget/quantitative target in Gate 2/3 without a baseline is a hypothesis, not a commitment.
+4. **Korean-first, bilingual notation** -- these directives are in English; deliverables (Decision Log, Brief, Plan) are written in Korean unless the user asks otherwise.
+5. **Never cross-reference client data without consent** -- reference cases and precedents must be sourced/cited, not invented, and client data stays siloed by account.
+
+---
+
+## Why this exists
+
+The recurring failure mode is going straight from a request to a finished plan. When direction isn't agreed first, plans come out bloated (everything crammed in), quant-skewed (arbitrary conversion targets), and tonally off. Gates fix this by forcing debate, then agreement, then documentation -- in that order.
+
+## The three gates
+
+Each gate is a checkpoint that **requires explicit user approval before advancing.** Do not skip ahead. At every gate, record rejected alternatives and dissenting views so the decision trail survives.
+
+| Gate | Purpose | Output | Advance when |
+|------|---------|--------|--------------|
+| 1. Discovery & Debate | Agree the ONE primary objective; pressure-test the idea | Decision Log (1 page) | User confirms objective & decision |
+| 2. Brief | Lock objective, audience, offer, outcomes, tone, message | Campaign Brief (1 page) | User approves the brief |
+| 3. Plan | Build the full plan/document | Full plan (docx) | -- (deliverable) |
+
+### Gate 1 -- Discovery & Debate
+
+Goal: reach agreement on a single primary objective and stress-test the idea **before any document exists.**
+
+Do:
+- **Objective priority** -- pick ONE primary objective; everything else is secondary. Force the trade-off.
+- **Debate both sides** -- steelman the idea, then argue against it as devil's advocate; respond to the strongest objection. Run a quick pre-mortem ("if this fails in 90 days, why?").
+- **Reference cases** -- bring 1-3 real examples of what worked/failed elsewhere (use web research or connected tools); cite sources.
+- **Expected effects as HYPOTHESES** -- not targets yet. State what you'd observe to know.
+- **Gaps -> [확인]** -- don't invent missing facts.
+- **Confirm the target brand** if it isn't obvious (see Cross-brand routing above) -- it determines which skills govern Gate 3.
+
+Output: fill `shared/templates/gate1-decision-log.md`. Present it and ask the user to confirm/adjust before Gate 2. See `shared/references/debate-and-outcomes.md` for facilitation prompts.
+
+### Gate 2 -- Brief
+
+Goal: a 1-page agreement that will govern the plan.
+
+Do:
+- Convert the agreed decision into a tight brief: objective, audience, offer, core + supporting messages, tone, channels.
+- **Assign outcome metrics across 4 tiers** (see below). Label any number without a baseline as a *hypothesis*. For each qualitative goal, name the brand **attribute / association / asset** it touches.
+
+Output: fill `shared/templates/gate2-campaign-brief.md`. Gate: user approves before Gate 3.
+
+### Gate 3 -- Plan
+
+Only now build the full plan. Hand off to the `marketing:campaign-plan` skill and `doc-generator` for the document.
+
+Enforce:
+- **Brevity / one-topic-one-place** -- keep the body decision-relevant; put **all** risks, compliance, and due-diligence in ONE section at the very end: **"준비 점검 사항"**. Don't scatter them.
+- **[확인] convention** -- mark any gap instead of guessing.
+- **Copy & compliance** -- route through the skills named in Cross-brand routing above for the campaign's target brand.
+
+Output: fill/expand `shared/templates/gate3-plan-outline.md`, then produce the document.
+
+## The 4-tier outcome framework (used at Gate 2 & 3)
+
+Diversify beyond conversion so goals are credible and not arbitrarily quantitative:
+
+1. **Awareness / cognitive** -- reach, recall, branded-search lift
+2. **Qualitative** -- message reaction, tone fit, consult quality -- *and name the brand asset it strengthens*
+3. **Relationship / advocacy** -- revisit intent, referral/recommendation, voluntary reviews
+4. **Quantitative conversion** -- inquiries, purchases -- *label as hypothesis if there's no baseline*
+
+## Principles baked in (from recurring feedback)
+
+- **Debate before document.** Gates 1-2 exist so Gate 3 is tight.
+- **Brevity.** Risks/compliance consolidated in one end section, not repeated throughout.
+- **Ask/confirm over completeness-anxiety.** Use `[확인]`.
+- **Diversified, brand-equity-anchored outcomes.** No lonely conversion targets.
+
+## Templates & references
+
+- `shared/templates/gate1-decision-log.md` -- Gate 1 Decision Log (1p)
+- `shared/templates/gate2-campaign-brief.md` -- Gate 2 Campaign Brief (1p)
+- `shared/templates/gate3-plan-outline.md` -- Gate 3 Plan outline (maps to `marketing:campaign-plan`)
+- `shared/references/debate-and-outcomes.md` -- facilitation prompts + the 4-tier outcome framework in depth
+
+## Reminder
+
+The gates are about sequencing decisions, not adding bureaucracy. If the user explicitly wants to skip to a draft, do so -- but tell them which gate you're bypassing and what risk that carries.

custom-skills/78-dintel-campaign-designer/shared/references/debate-and-outcomes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+# Facilitation Guide — Debate & Outcomes
+
+Deeper guidance for running Gate 1's debate and setting Gate 2's outcome metrics.
+
+## Running the Gate 1 debate (don't rubber-stamp)
+
+**Objective priority — force one.** If the user lists several goals (retention, cash, awareness), make them rank. Multiple co-equal objectives are the root of bloated, contradictory plans. Ask: "If we could only achieve one, which one?"
+
+**Steelman, then devil's advocate.**
+- Steelman: state the strongest possible case FOR the idea, better than the user did.
+- Devil's advocate: argue AGAINST it — where it wastes money, annoys customers, cannibalizes, or breaks compliance.
+- Then answer the single strongest objection. If it can't be answered, that's a finding.
+
+**Pre-mortem.** "It's 90 days later and this flopped. Write the reason." Common failure seeds: wrong audience, offer too strong/weak, no follow-through, channel fatigue, compliance block.
+
+**Reference cases.** Pull 1–3 concrete precedents (competitors, other categories, past campaigns). Cite sources. Ask what specifically transfers and what doesn't. Avoid "best practices" hand-waving.
+
+**Hypotheses, not targets (yet).** At Gate 1, expected effects are hypotheses with an observation method: "We believe X will move Y; we'll know by watching Z." Numbers get committed only at Gate 2, and only with a baseline.
+
+## The 4-tier outcome framework (Gate 2)
+
+Brand marketing lives partly in perception, which is hard to measure — but "hard to measure" must not become "vague direction." Anchor each qualitative goal to a **brand-equity** element: an **attribute** (what the brand is), an **association** (what it evokes), or an **asset** (an owned phrase/symbol). That keeps it concrete.
+
+| Tier | Examples of metrics | Note |
+|------|--------------------|------|
+| Awareness / cognitive | reach, impressions, branded-search lift, recall | leading indicators |
+| Qualitative | message reaction, tone-fit, consult quality, sentiment | **name the brand attribute/association/asset it strengthens** |
+| Relationship / advocacy | revisit intent, referral/recommendation, voluntary reviews | trust signals |
+| Quantitative conversion | inquiries, bookings, purchases, revenue | **no baseline → label as hypothesis, not target** |
+
+**Baseline rule.** A number without a baseline is a guess wearing a target's clothes. Either supply a baseline (past data, connected analytics) or explicitly label it a hypothesis / observation metric. This is what makes targets credible.
+
+**Measurement method per qualitative goal.** For each soft metric, write how you'd observe it (survey item, review sentiment, consult-note tag). If you can't name a method, it's a direction, not a metric — say so.
+
+## Quick gate checklist
+- Gate 1 pass: one primary objective agreed; strongest objection answered; ≥1 reference case; effects framed as hypotheses; user approved.
+- Gate 2 pass: brief fits one page; outcomes span the 4 tiers; baseline-less numbers labeled hypotheses; qualitative goals tied to brand assets; user approved.
+- Gate 3: body decision-relevant; risks/compliance consolidated in "준비 점검 사항"; gaps marked [확인]; copy through jamie-copy-trimmer; compliance via jamie-brand-guardian.

custom-skills/78-dintel-campaign-designer/shared/templates/gate1-decision-log.md

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+# 결정 로그 — Gate 1: Discovery & Debate
+
+<!-- One page. Produced BEFORE any plan document. Fill it, present it, then get user approval to pass Gate 1.
+     Language: Korean deliverable. Keep it to one page. -->
+
+## 0. 개요
+- 캠페인/과제:
+- 작성일 / 참여자:
+
+## 1. 목적 우선순위 <!-- pick ONE primary; force the trade-off -->
+- **주 목적 (1개):**
+- 부 목적:
+- 왜 이것이 1순위인가:
+
+## 2. 디베이트 (찬 / 반) <!-- steelman both sides honestly -->
+- 찬성 논거 (통하는 이유):
+- 반대 논거 (악마의 변호인):
+- 프리모템 — "90일 뒤 실패했다면 이유는?":
+- 반론에 대한 대응:
+
+## 3. 레퍼런스 사례 <!-- 1-3 real cases, cite source -->
+- 사례 1 (출처): — 시사점:
+- 사례 2 (출처): — 시사점:
+
+## 4. 기대효과 (가설) <!-- hypotheses, NOT targets. baseline unknown = hypothesis -->
+- 가설:
+- 검증 방법 (무엇을 보면 아는가):
+
+## 5. 기각된 대안 / 반대 의견 <!-- preserve the decision trail -->
+- 검토했으나 채택 안 함: — 이유:
+
+## 6. 결정
+- 결정 사항:
+
+## 7. 준비 점검 사항 <!-- consolidate gaps & risks here, not scattered -->
+- [확인] (정보 부재 / 사실 검증 필요):
+
+---
+## 게이트 승인
+- [ ] 의사결정자(원장 등) 승인 → **Gate 2 (브리프)** 진행

custom-skills/78-dintel-campaign-designer/shared/templates/gate2-campaign-brief.md

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+# 캠페인 브리프 — Gate 2
+
+<!-- One page. This is the agreement that governs the plan. Approve before Gate 3.
+     Carry forward the objective decided at Gate 1. Korean deliverable. -->
+
+## 1. 목적 <!-- the single primary objective locked at Gate 1 -->
+
+## 2. 타겟
+- 1차 / 2차:
+- 오디언스 프로파일 (한 문장):
+
+## 3. 오퍼 / 핵심 제안
+
+## 4. 메시지
+- 핵심 메시지 (한 문장):
+- 보조 메시지 (2~3):
+
+## 5. 성과 지표 — 4층위 <!-- diversify; label baseline-less numbers as 가설; name the brand asset each qualitative goal touches -->
+- 인지적 (도달 / 상기 / 브랜드 검색량):
+- 정성적 (반응 / 톤 적합성) — **강화 브랜드 자산(속성·연상):**
+- 관계·추천 (재방문 / 추천 의사 / 자발적 후기):
+- 정량 전환 (문의 / 결제) — **[가설? baseline 유무]:**
+
+## 6. 톤 & 채널 방향
+- 톤:
+- 채널 (우선순위):
+
+## 7. 제약 / 컴플라이언스 (요약) <!-- summary only; full detail lives in the plan's 준비 점검 사항 -->
+
+---
+## 게이트 승인
+- [ ] 승인 → **Gate 3 (기획서화)** 진행

custom-skills/78-dintel-campaign-designer/shared/templates/gate3-plan-outline.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+# 기획서 아웃라인 — Gate 3
+
+<!-- Build ONLY after Gate 2 approval. Hand off to the marketing campaign-plan skill + docx.
+     Two hard rules:
+       (1) Keep the body decision-relevant. Put ALL risks/compliance/due-diligence in ONE section at the END: "준비 점검 사항".
+       (2) Use [확인] for any gap instead of inventing.
+     Korean deliverable. -->
+
+0. 한눈에 보기 (Executive summary)
+1. 캠페인 개요 <!-- from the Brief -->
+2. 프로그램 / 제품 구조 & 경제성
+3. 타겟 & 메시지
+4. 채널 전략
+5. 주차별 액션플랜 / 콘텐츠 캘린더
+6. 필요 콘텐츠 자산 <!-- copy runs through jamie-copy-trimmer -->
+7. 성과지표 & 트래킹 <!-- 4층위, carried from the Brief -->
+8. 리스크 & 대응
+9. 다음 단계 (Next steps)
+
+────────────────────────
+▶ **준비 점검 사항** <!-- consolidate here: 의료광고 심의, 주의의무, 위험요인, 부가세/고지 표기, 그리고 모든 [확인] 항목 -->
+- [확인] …

custom-skills/79-dintel-skill-update/SKILL.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ version: 1.1.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "79"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 autonomy: triggered
 ---
 

custom-skills/79-dintel-skill-update/desktop/SKILL.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ version: 1.1.0
 last_updated: 2026-05-18
 canon_compliance: v1.3
 agent-id: "79"
-agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (8 agents + 1 meta-agent)
+agent-corps: D.intelligence Agent Corps (9 agents + 1 meta-agent)
 autonomy: triggered
 ---
 

custom-skills/_dintel-shared/README.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # _dintel-shared — D.intelligence Agent Corps Shared Environment
 
-Shared Python package and utilities used by all `dintel-` Claude Skills (agents 70-77, 88).
+Shared Python package and utilities used by all `dintel-` Claude Skills (agents 70-78, 88).
 
 ## Setup
 

custom-skills/_dintel-shared/USER-GUIDE.md

@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
 # D.intelligence Agent Corps — User Guide
 
-> **Version**: 1.0.0
+> **Version**: 1.1.0
-> **Updated**: 2026-03-09
+> **Updated**: 2026-07-01
 > **Author**: D.intelligence Engineering
 
 ---
 
 ## Overview
 
-D.intelligence Agent Corps는 9개의 AI 에이전트로 구성된 스킬 번들입니다.
+D.intelligence Agent Corps는 10개의 AI 에이전트로 구성된 스킬 번들입니다.
 모든 에이전트는 D.intelligence의 브랜드 가이드, 서비스 아키텍처, 가격 정책을 공유하며,
 일관된 품질의 결과물을 생성합니다.
 
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ D.intelligence Agent Corps는 9개의 AI 에이전트로 구성된 스킬 번들
 │  #75 Marketing Mgr     ←── 콘텐츠 파이프라인        │
 │  #76 Back Office Mgr   ←── 계약/인보이스/HR         │
 │  #77 Account Mgr       ←── 고객 관계 관리           │
+│  #78 Campaign Designer ←── 캠페인 3-게이트 기획      │
 │  #88 Skill Update      ←── 메타 에이전트 (일괄 변경)│
 │                                                     │
 │  _dintel-shared/         ←── 공유 인프라              │
@@ -49,7 +50,7 @@ cd our-claude-skills/custom-skills/_dintel-shared/
 |-------|--------|---------|
 | **Auto** | #70 | Runs automatically when D.intelligence content is detected |
 | **Auto + Ask** | #71 | Auto-activates, asks before making changes |
-| **Draft & Wait** | #72, #73, #75, #76 | Generates draft, then STOPS for Andrew's review |
+| **Draft & Wait** | #72, #73, #75, #76, #78 | Generates draft, then STOPS for Andrew's review |
 | **Inquiry-driven** | #74 | Asks structured questions before recommending |
 | **Mixed** | #77 | Monitors autonomously, asks before client-facing actions |
 | **Triggered** | #88 | Only runs when explicitly invoked by Andrew |
@@ -357,6 +358,36 @@ B. 메시지 구조 (25/25)
 
 ---
 
+### #78 Campaign Designer — 캠페인 디자이너
+
+**What it does**: 캠페인/프로모션/이벤트/런칭 기획을 3-게이트 프로세스로 진행 — Discovery & Debate → Brief → Plan. 문서부터 만들지 않고, 방향에 먼저 합의합니다. D.intelligence 전용이 아니라 OurDigital·Jamie 등 어떤 브랜드의 캠페인이든 동일한 게이트로 진행합니다.
+
+**When to use**:
+- 캠페인/프로모션/이벤트/런칭 기획 요청
+- 기획안을 바로 만들어달라는 요청이 와도, 방향 합의 없이 초안이 나온 전례가 있다면 먼저 게이트를 거치도록 제안
+- Gate 2에서 정량 목표만 있고 정성/관계 지표가 없을 때
+
+**Example use cases**:
+
+```
+1. "이번 여름 프로모션 기획해줘"
+   → Gate 1: 목적 1순위 확정 + 찬반 디베이트 + 프리모템 + 레퍼런스 사례
+   → 결정 로그 제시 → 승인 대기
+
+2. "Gate 1 승인, 브리프 만들어줘"
+   → Gate 2: 오디언스/오퍼/메시지/톤 + 4층위 성과지표 확정
+   → 캠페인 브리프 제시 → 승인 대기
+
+3. "브리프 승인, 기획서 만들어줘"
+   → Gate 3: marketing:campaign-plan + doc-generator로 문서화
+   → 리스크/컴플라이언스는 "준비 점검 사항"에 일괄 정리
+
+4. "Jamie 캠페인이야, 카피는 어디서 다듬어?"
+   → Cross-brand routing: Jamie 브랜드 → 48 jamie-copy-trimmer(카피) + 41 jamie-brand-audit(컴플라이언스)
+```
+
+---
+
 ### #88 Skill Update — 스킬 업데이트 (메타 에이전트)
 
 **What it does**: 공유 참조(브랜드, 가격, 서비스 모듈 등)가 변경될 때, 영향 받는 모든 스킬을 일괄 업데이트합니다.
@@ -518,3 +549,4 @@ _dintel-shared/
 | Version | Date | Changes |
 |---------|------|---------|
 | 1.0.0 | 2026-03-09 | Initial release — 9 agents + shared infra |
+| 1.1.0 | 2026-07-01 | Added #78 Campaign Designer (Draft & Wait, cross-brand 3-gate campaign planning) — 10 agents + shared infra |