Andrew Yim
f27fb7a2c4
Some checks failed
Verify Skills / verify-skills (push) Has been cancelled
Import two skills authored in Claude Cowork: jamie-copy-trimmer as a root-only Jamie skill, and campaign-gate-process as dintel-campaign-designer with full D.intelligence Agent Corps packaging (code/desktop/shared, agent-id 78, Draft & Wait autonomy) since it now sits inside the 70-79 block. Bumps the corps roster count to 9 agents + 1 meta-agent across all sibling skills and registers #78 in the shared USER-GUIDE/README. Also adds .claude/commands wrappers and ~/.claude/skills symlinks so both are usable. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
41 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
41 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
# 5-Axis Re-scoring Rubric
|
||
|
||
Score the original and the improved copy on the same basis to make "did it actually get better?" objective.
|
||
|
||
## Axes and scale (1–5 each; compliance is a gate)
|
||
|
||
| Axis | Question | 1 | 5 |
|
||
|------|----------|---|---|
|
||
| **Freshness / Hook** | Non-stale and eye-catching? | tired, boilerplate | makes you stop and read |
|
||
| **Distinctiveness** | Avoids the clichés everyone uses? | seen-it-before | only this clinic |
|
||
| **Brand fit** | Matches tone & brand assets? | off-tone | reinforces brand-ness |
|
||
| **Compliance (심의)** | Free of risk expressions? | — | — (PASS/FAIL gate) |
|
||
| **Clarity** | Understood instantly? | what does it say | one-pass clear |
|
||
|
||
## Compliance gate rule
|
||
- If any 🔴 (risk expression) exists → **FAIL** → that option cannot be adopted, no matter how high the other scores.
|
||
- Missing mandatory disclosure (advertiser / side-effects / review number) is also a FAIL → then `[확인]`.
|
||
|
||
## Brand-asset line (required)
|
||
When scoring brand fit, avoid stopping at a vague "feel." Write one line:
|
||
> Brand **attribute / association / asset** this copy strengthens: (e.g., a "naturalness" association, an "honest expert" attribute, a slogan asset)
|
||
|
||
This anchors qualitative judgment in a measurable direction instead of vague sentiment.
|
||
|
||
## Judgment / improvement priority
|
||
1. Compliance gate first (fix immediately if FAIL)
|
||
2. Clarity (if it doesn't read, appeal is moot)
|
||
3. Distinctiveness & freshness (remove clichés → strengthen hook)
|
||
4. Brand-fit fine-tuning
|
||
|
||
## Scoring example
|
||
```
|
||
| Axis | Original | Recommended |
|
||
| Freshness | 2 | 4 |
|
||
| Distinctiveness | 2 | 4 |
|
||
| Brand fit | 3 | 5 |
|
||
| Compliance | PASS | PASS |
|
||
| Clarity | 4 | 4 |
|
||
→ Strengthened asset: "표정 습관" reframe reinforces the "honest educator" attribute
|
||
```
|