Files
Andrew Yim f27fb7a2c4
Some checks failed
Verify Skills / verify-skills (push) Has been cancelled
Add jamie-copy-trimmer (48) and dintel-campaign-designer (78) skills
Import two skills authored in Claude Cowork: jamie-copy-trimmer as a
root-only Jamie skill, and campaign-gate-process as dintel-campaign-designer
with full D.intelligence Agent Corps packaging (code/desktop/shared,
agent-id 78, Draft & Wait autonomy) since it now sits inside the 70-79
block. Bumps the corps roster count to 9 agents + 1 meta-agent across all
sibling skills and registers #78 in the shared USER-GUIDE/README. Also adds
.claude/commands wrappers and ~/.claude/skills symlinks so both are usable.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-03 12:59:19 +09:00

39 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Facilitation Guide — Debate & Outcomes
Deeper guidance for running Gate 1's debate and setting Gate 2's outcome metrics.
## Running the Gate 1 debate (don't rubber-stamp)
**Objective priority — force one.** If the user lists several goals (retention, cash, awareness), make them rank. Multiple co-equal objectives are the root of bloated, contradictory plans. Ask: "If we could only achieve one, which one?"
**Steelman, then devil's advocate.**
- Steelman: state the strongest possible case FOR the idea, better than the user did.
- Devil's advocate: argue AGAINST it — where it wastes money, annoys customers, cannibalizes, or breaks compliance.
- Then answer the single strongest objection. If it can't be answered, that's a finding.
**Pre-mortem.** "It's 90 days later and this flopped. Write the reason." Common failure seeds: wrong audience, offer too strong/weak, no follow-through, channel fatigue, compliance block.
**Reference cases.** Pull 13 concrete precedents (competitors, other categories, past campaigns). Cite sources. Ask what specifically transfers and what doesn't. Avoid "best practices" hand-waving.
**Hypotheses, not targets (yet).** At Gate 1, expected effects are hypotheses with an observation method: "We believe X will move Y; we'll know by watching Z." Numbers get committed only at Gate 2, and only with a baseline.
## The 4-tier outcome framework (Gate 2)
Brand marketing lives partly in perception, which is hard to measure — but "hard to measure" must not become "vague direction." Anchor each qualitative goal to a **brand-equity** element: an **attribute** (what the brand is), an **association** (what it evokes), or an **asset** (an owned phrase/symbol). That keeps it concrete.
| Tier | Examples of metrics | Note |
|------|--------------------|------|
| Awareness / cognitive | reach, impressions, branded-search lift, recall | leading indicators |
| Qualitative | message reaction, tone-fit, consult quality, sentiment | **name the brand attribute/association/asset it strengthens** |
| Relationship / advocacy | revisit intent, referral/recommendation, voluntary reviews | trust signals |
| Quantitative conversion | inquiries, bookings, purchases, revenue | **no baseline → label as hypothesis, not target** |
**Baseline rule.** A number without a baseline is a guess wearing a target's clothes. Either supply a baseline (past data, connected analytics) or explicitly label it a hypothesis / observation metric. This is what makes targets credible.
**Measurement method per qualitative goal.** For each soft metric, write how you'd observe it (survey item, review sentiment, consult-note tag). If you can't name a method, it's a direction, not a metric — say so.
## Quick gate checklist
- Gate 1 pass: one primary objective agreed; strongest objection answered; ≥1 reference case; effects framed as hypotheses; user approved.
- Gate 2 pass: brief fits one page; outcomes span the 4 tiers; baseline-less numbers labeled hypotheses; qualitative goals tied to brand assets; user approved.
- Gate 3: body decision-relevant; risks/compliance consolidated in "준비 점검 사항"; gaps marked [확인]; copy through jamie-copy-trimmer; compliance via jamie-brand-guardian.