Andrew Yim
0bc24d00b9
Complete implementation of OurDigital skills with dual-platform support (Claude Desktop + Claude Code) following standardized structure. Skills created: - 01-ourdigital-brand-guide: Brand reference & style guidelines - 02-ourdigital-blog: Korean blog drafts (blog.ourdigital.org) - 03-ourdigital-journal: English essays (journal.ourdigital.org) - 04-ourdigital-research: Research prompts & workflows - 05-ourdigital-document: Notion-to-presentation pipeline - 06-ourdigital-designer: Visual/image prompt generation - 07-ourdigital-ad-manager: Ad copywriting & keyword research - 08-ourdigital-trainer: Training materials & workshop planning - 09-ourdigital-backoffice: Quotes, proposals, cost analysis - 10-ourdigital-skill-creator: Meta skill for creating new skills Features: - YAML frontmatter with "ourdigital" or "our" prefix triggers - Standardized directory structure (code/, desktop/, shared/, docs/) - Shared environment setup (_ourdigital-shared/) - Comprehensive reference documentation - Cross-skill integration support Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: "{Evocative Title}"
|
|
meta_description: "{Compelling 155-character description}"
|
|
slug: "{url-slug}"
|
|
tags: ["{tag1}", "{tag2}", "{tag3}"]
|
|
author: "Andrew Yim"
|
|
date: "{YYYY-MM-DD}"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# {Title}
|
|
|
|
{Opening: Begin with a specific moment, scene, or question. Draw the reader into an experience before broadening to larger themes. This should feel intimate and immediate.}
|
|
|
|
{Transition: Move from the specific to the general, hinting at the essay's territory.}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
{First thread of exploration. Introduce an observation or idea that sets the stage for deeper inquiry. Weave in historical context or cultural reference.}
|
|
|
|
{Develop the observation. Ask a rhetorical question that deepens the inquiry.}
|
|
|
|
> {Pull quote or key insight that captures this section's essence.}
|
|
|
|
{Connection to next thread—ideas should flow naturally.}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
{Second thread. Build on the previous section, introducing a new angle or paradox. The complexity grows.}
|
|
|
|
{Personal reflection or specific example that grounds abstract ideas.}
|
|
|
|
{Analysis of what this means in broader context.}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
{Third thread. Synthesis begins here. Threads start weaving together. New understanding emerges from the collision of ideas.}
|
|
|
|
{Acknowledge tensions without resolving them. Epistemic humility—what we don't and can't know.}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## {Optional section heading for longer pieces}
|
|
|
|
{Continue exploration if needed. Each section should add depth, not just length.}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
{Closing: Return to something from the opening, but transformed by the journey. Leave an open question—not as evasion, but as invitation. The reader should leave thinking, not satisfied.}
|
|
|
|
{Final rhetorical question or paradox that resonates.}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
*Originally published in [OurDigital Journal](https://journal.ourdigital.org)*
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
Quality Checklist:
|
|
- [ ] Evocative opening
|
|
- [ ] Rhetorical questions throughout
|
|
- [ ] Technical + human connection
|
|
- [ ] At least one paradox
|
|
- [ ] Open-ended closing
|
|
- [ ] 1,000-2,000 words
|
|
-->
|