Files
our-claude-skills/custom-skills/90-reference-curator/06-markdown-exporter/code/CLAUDE.md
Andrew Yim f215c11c32 feat(reference-curator): implement Python scripts + Gemini quality gate
Build the refcurator shared Python package and 7 CLI scripts that were
previously specification-only. Add Gemini CLI as an independent pre-distillation
quality evaluator, replacing the circular Claude-self-review pattern.

Key changes:
- shared/lib/src/refcurator/: 7-module package (config, db, models, utils,
  manifest, gemini) with PyMySQL + JSON file dual backend
- 7 Click CLI scripts: discover, crawl_mgr, repo, distiller, reviewer,
  exporter, pipeline — each with subcommands for data management
- Gemini quality gate: evaluates raw content BEFORE distillation using
  5 criteria (relevance, authority, completeness, freshness, distill_value)
- Pipeline reordered: discovery → crawl → store → evaluate → distill → export
- Bug fixes from Codex adversarial review:
  - FileBackend now hard-fails on JOIN/aggregate/GROUP BY queries
  - Exporter uses MAX(review_id) to prevent shipping stale approvals
  - Distiller updates existing rows on refactor instead of forking
- Updated all 7 CLAUDE.md directives with real script references
- install.sh updated with refcurator package install step

51/51 E2E tests passing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-12 18:22:28 +09:00

94 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown

# Markdown Exporter
Exports approved reference content as structured markdown files for project knowledge or fine-tuning datasets.
## Trigger Keywords
"export references", "generate project files", "create markdown output", "export for fine-tuning", "build knowledge base"
## Export Types
| Type | Format | Use Case |
|------|--------|----------|
| `project` | Nested markdown | Claude Projects knowledge |
| `finetuning` | JSONL | Model fine-tuning dataset |
## Workflow
### Step 1: Export Project Files
```bash
uv run python scripts/exporter.py project \
--output ~/reference-library/exports/ \
--min-score 0.80 \
--structure nested_by_topic
```
Output structure:
```
exports/
├── INDEX.md
├── prompt-engineering/
│ ├── _index.md
│ ├── 00-chain-of-thought.md
│ └── 01-few-shot-prompting.md
└── claude-models/
├── _index.md
└── 00-model-comparison.md
```
### Step 2: Generate INDEX
```bash
uv run python scripts/exporter.py index --output ~/reference-library/exports/INDEX.md
```
### Step 3: Add Cross-References
```bash
uv run python scripts/exporter.py crossrefs --input ~/reference-library/exports/
```
### Step 4: Verify Export
```bash
uv run python scripts/exporter.py verify --path ~/reference-library/exports/
```
### Step 5: Fine-tuning Export (Optional)
```bash
uv run python scripts/exporter.py finetuning \
--output ~/reference-library/exports/training.jsonl \
--max-tokens 4096
```
JSONL format:
```json
{
"messages": [
{"role": "system", "content": "You are an expert on AI and prompt engineering."},
{"role": "user", "content": "Explain {title}"},
{"role": "assistant", "content": "{structured_content}"}
],
"metadata": {"source": "{url}", "quality_score": 0.92}
}
```
### Step 6: Log Export Job
```bash
uv run python scripts/exporter.py log --name "April 2026 Export" --type project_files --docs 45
```
## Scripts
| Command | Purpose |
|---------|---------|
| `exporter.py project` | Export as nested markdown files |
| `exporter.py finetuning` | Export as JSONL training dataset |
| `exporter.py index` | Generate INDEX.md table of contents |
| `exporter.py crossrefs` | Add cross-reference links |
| `exporter.py verify` | Verify export integrity |
| `exporter.py log` | Log export job to DB |
## Integration
| From | To |
|------|-----|
| quality-reviewer (approved) | → |
| → | Project knowledge / Fine-tuning dataset |